Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Chester Step Test 2 to Predict Aerobic Capacity

Burt, Dean; Forsyth, Jacky; Jones, Sam; Buckley, John

Authors

Jacky Forsyth



Abstract

The Chester Step Test (CST) is used in occupational and healthcare settings to estimate cardiovascular fitness (
ห™
๐‘‰
๐‘‚2max); however, in attempts to overcome
ห™
๐‘‰
๐‘‚2max- prediction error, a revised version has been developed (CST2). This study investigated the testโ€“retest reliability and criterion validity of the CST2. In a randomized order, at the same time of day, with at least 24โ€‰hours rest between trials, 50 healthy participants (32 males, 18 females, age: 34.9โ€‰ยฑโ€‰10.9 y, body mass: 79.1โ€‰ยฑโ€‰14.5โ€‰kg, stature: 174.3โ€‰ยฑโ€‰10.9โ€‰cm) completed the CST2 twice (CST2a; CST2b) and a treadmill-based
ห™
๐‘‰
๐‘‚2max test. Testโ€“retest reliability and criterion validity were examined using a repeated measures ANOVA and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA). No significant bias was reported between the CST2a and CST2b predicted and actual
ห™
๐‘‰
๐‘‚2max (pโ€‰>โ€‰.05). The biasโ€‰ยฑ95% LoA (โˆ’0.48โ€‰ยฑโ€‰3.4โ€‰ml.kgโˆ’1.minโˆ’1) suggest that the CST2 is a reliable predictor of
ห™
๐‘‰
๐‘‚2max. However, the biasโ€‰ยฑ95% LoA between the CST2 predicted and actual
ห™
๐‘‰
๐‘‚2max ranged from 1.08โ€“1.6โ€‰ยฑโ€‰11โ€“11.5โ€‰ml.kgโˆ’1.minโˆ’1, translating to a 31% prediction error. The CST2 is a reliable measure of
ห™
๐‘‰
๐‘‚2max however should only be considered when an estimate is required.

Citation

Burt, D., Forsyth, J., Jones, S., & Buckley, J. (in press). Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Chester Step Test 2 to Predict Aerobic Capacity. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2025.2481864

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 26, 2025
Online Publication Date Mar 26, 2025
Deposit Date Apr 15, 2025
Journal Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Print ISSN 1091-367X
Electronic ISSN 1532-7841
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Pages 1-8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2025.2481864
Keywords cardiovascular fitness; maximal oxygen uptake; Chester Step Test; reliability; validity
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1195511
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1091367X.2025.2481864