Dean Burt d.burt@keele.ac.uk
Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Chester Step Test 2 to Predict Aerobic Capacity
Burt, Dean; Forsyth, Jacky; Jones, Sam; Buckley, John
Authors
Jacky Forsyth
Sam Jones s.jones3@keele.ac.uk
John Buckley j.p.buckley@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
The Chester Step Test (CST) is used in occupational and healthcare settings to estimate cardiovascular fitness (
ห
๐
๐2max); however, in attempts to overcome
ห
๐
๐2max- prediction error, a revised version has been developed (CST2). This study investigated the testโretest reliability and criterion validity of the CST2. In a randomized order, at the same time of day, with at least 24โhours rest between trials, 50 healthy participants (32 males, 18 females, age: 34.9โยฑโ10.9 y, body mass: 79.1โยฑโ14.5โkg, stature: 174.3โยฑโ10.9โcm) completed the CST2 twice (CST2a; CST2b) and a treadmill-based
ห
๐
๐2max test. Testโretest reliability and criterion validity were examined using a repeated measures ANOVA and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA). No significant bias was reported between the CST2a and CST2b predicted and actual
ห
๐
๐2max (pโ>โ.05). The biasโยฑ95% LoA (โ0.48โยฑโ3.4โml.kgโ1.minโ1) suggest that the CST2 is a reliable predictor of
ห
๐
๐2max. However, the biasโยฑ95% LoA between the CST2 predicted and actual
ห
๐
๐2max ranged from 1.08โ1.6โยฑโ11โ11.5โml.kgโ1.minโ1, translating to a 31% prediction error. The CST2 is a reliable measure of
ห
๐
๐2max however should only be considered when an estimate is required.
Citation
Burt, D., Forsyth, J., Jones, S., & Buckley, J. (in press). Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Chester Step Test 2 to Predict Aerobic Capacity. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2025.2481864
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 26, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 26, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Apr 15, 2025 |
Journal | Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science |
Print ISSN | 1091-367X |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-7841 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 1-8 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2025.2481864 |
Keywords | cardiovascular fitness; maximal oxygen uptake; Chester Step Test; reliability; validity |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1195511 |
Publisher URL | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1091367X.2025.2481864 |
You might also like
An immersive online response to a practical problem
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search