Peter Croft
The science of clinical practice: disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about "what is likely to happen" should shape clinical practice
Croft, Peter; Altman, Douglas G; Deeks, Jonathan J; Dunn, Kate M; Hay, Alastair D; Hemingway, Harry; LeResche, Linda; Peat, George; Perel, Pablo; Petersen, Steffen E; Riley, Richard D; Roberts, Ian; Sharpe, Michael; Stevens, Richard J; Van Der Windt, Danielle A; Von Korff, Michael; Timmis, Adam
Authors
Douglas G Altman
Jonathan J Deeks
Professor Kathryn Dunn k.m.dunn@keele.ac.uk
Alastair D Hay
Harry Hemingway
Linda LeResche
George Peat
Pablo Perel
Steffen E Petersen
Richard D Riley
Ian Roberts
Michael Sharpe
Richard J Stevens
Danielle Van Der Windt d.van.der.windt@keele.ac.uk
Michael Von Korff
Adam Timmis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis is the traditional basis for decision-making in clinical practice. Evidence is often lacking about future benefits and harms of these decisions for patients diagnosed with and without disease. We propose that a model of clinical practice focused on patient prognosis and predicting the likelihood of future outcomes may be more useful. DISCUSSION: Disease diagnosis can provide crucial information for clinical decisions that influence outcome in serious acute illness. However, the central role of diagnosis in clinical practice is challenged by evidence that it does not always benefit patients and that factors other than disease are important in determining patient outcome. The concept of disease as a dichotomous 'yes' or 'no' is challenged by the frequent use of diagnostic indicators with continuous distributions, such as blood sugar, which are better understood as contributing information about the probability of a patient's future outcome. Moreover, many illnesses, such as chronic fatigue, cannot usefully be labelled from a disease-diagnosis perspective. In such cases, a prognostic model provides an alternative framework for clinical practice that extends beyond disease and diagnosis and incorporates a wide range of information to predict future patient outcomes and to guide decisions to improve them. Such information embraces non-disease factors and genetic and other biomarkers which influence outcome. SUMMARY: Patient prognosis can provide the framework for modern clinical practice to integrate information from the expanding biological, social, and clinical database for more effective and efficient care.
Citation
Croft, P., Altman, D. G., Deeks, J. J., Dunn, K. M., Hay, A. D., Hemingway, H., …Timmis, A. (2015). The science of clinical practice: disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about "what is likely to happen" should shape clinical practice. BMC Medicine, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0265-4
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 24, 2014 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 30, 2015 |
Publication Date | Jan 30, 2015 |
Journal | BMC Medicine |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Pages | 20 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0265-4 |
Keywords | diagnosis |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0265-4 |
Files
The science of clinical practice: disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about "what is likely to happen" should shape clinical practice..pdf
(403 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search