Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Item response theory evaluation of the biomedical scale of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale.

Item response theory evaluation of the biomedical scale of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale. Thumbnail


Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The assessment of health care professionals' attitudes and beliefs towards musculoskeletal pain is essential because they are key determinants of their clinical practice behaviour. The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) biomedical scale evaluates the degree of health professionals' biomedical orientation towards musculoskeletal pain and was never assessed using item response theory (IRT). This study aimed at assessing the psychometric performance of the 10-item biomedical scale of the PABS scale using IRT. METHODS: Two cross-sectional samples (BeBack, n = 1016; DABS; n = 958) of health care professionals working in the UK were analysed. Mokken scale analysis (nonparametric IRT) and common factor analysis were used to assess dimensionality of the instrument. Parametric IRT was used to assess model fit, item parameters, and local reliability (measurement precision). RESULTS: Results were largely similar in the two samples and the scale was found to be unidimensional. The graded response model showed adequate fit, covering a broad range of the measured construct in terms of item difficulty. Item 3 showed some misfit but only in the DABS sample. Some items (i.e. 7, 8 and 9) displayed remarkably higher discrimination parameters than others (4, 5 and 10). The scale showed satisfactory measurement precision (reliability > 0.70) between theta values -2 and +3. DISCUSSION: The 10-item biomedical scale of the PABS displayed adequate psychometric performance in two large samples of health care professionals, and it is suggested to assess group-level professionals degree of biomedical orientation towards musculoskeletal pain.

Citation

(2018). Item response theory evaluation of the biomedical scale of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale. PloS one, e0202539 - ?. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202539

Acceptance Date Aug 6, 2018
Publication Date Sep 12, 2018
Journal PLoS One
Print ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Pages e0202539 - ?
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202539
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202539

Files




Downloadable Citations