Francesco Moroni
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Moroni, Francesco; Azzalini, Lorenzo; Sondergaard, Lars; Attizzani, Guilherme F.; Garcia, Santiago; Jneid, Hani; Mamas, Mamas; Bagur, Rodrigo
Authors
Lorenzo Azzalini
Lars Sondergaard
Guilherme F. Attizzani
Santiago Garcia
Hani Jneid
Mamas Mamas m.mamas@keele.ac.uk
Rodrigo Bagur
Abstract
Background There is a concern that resheathing/repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to an increased risk of periprocedural complications. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term impact on clinical outcomes of resheathing for repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI procedures. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify studies comparing outcomes between patients requiring resheathing/repositioning during TAVI and those who did not. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the association of resheathing compared with no resheathing with clinical outcomes after TAVI. Seven studies including 4501 participants (pooled mean age, 80.9±7.4 years; 54% women; and 1374 [30.5%] patients requiring resheathing/repositioning) were included in this study. No significant differences between the 2 groups were identified with regards to safety: 30-day mortality (n=3125; odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.33]; I2=0%), stroke (n=4121; OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.74-1.62]; I2=0%), coronary obstruction (n=3000; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 0.17-33.47]; I2=75%), major vascular complications (n=3125; OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.66-1.33]; I2=0%), major bleeding (n=3125; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.94-2.01]; I2=39%), acute kidney injury (n=3495; OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.64-2.62]; I2=44%), and efficacy outcomes: device success (n=1196; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51-1.14]; I2=0%), need for a second valve (n=3170; OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 0.96-8.48]; I2=62%), significant (moderate or higher) paravalvular leak (n=1151; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.83-2.80]; I2=0%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (n=1908; OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.68-1.57]; I2=58%). One-year mortality was similar between groups (n=1972; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68-1.47]; I2=0%). Conclusions Resheathing of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI is associated with similar periprocedural risk compared with no resheathing in several patient-important outcomes. These data support the safety of current self-expanding transcatheter heart valves with resheathing features. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021273715.
Citation
Moroni, F., Azzalini, L., Sondergaard, L., Attizzani, G. F., Garcia, S., Jneid, H., …Bagur, R. (2022). Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association, 11(12), e024707 - ?. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024707
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 13, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 14, 2022 |
Publication Date | Jun 21, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | May 30, 2023 |
Journal | Journal of the American Heart Association |
Publisher | Wiley Open Access |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 12 |
Article Number | ARTN e024707 |
Pages | e024707 - ? |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024707 |
Keywords | resheathing; TAVI; aortic stenosis; TAVR; repositioning; transcatheter; self-expanding |
Publisher URL | https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.024707 |
Files
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.pdf
(5 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search