Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?

Parsons

Authors

Parsons



Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing is a growing phenomenon, fuelled by the notion that knowledge equals control. One ethical question that arises concerns the proband's duty to share information indicating genetic risks in their relatives. However, such duties are unenforceable and may result in the realisation of anticipated harm to relatives. We argue for a shift in responsibility from proband to provider, placing a duty on test providers in the event of identified actionable risks to relatives. Starting from Parker and Lucassen's (2004) 'joint account model', we adapt Kilbride's (2018) application of the rule of rescue and balance it against the relative's right not to know, placing responsibility on the providers of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Where the risk of disease to a relative is actionable, we argue providers ought to share results even in the face of the proband's objections. Confidentiality issues are navigated by a pre-emptive consent model, whereby consumers agree to the sharing of certain information with their relatives ahead of testing and as a condition of testing. When a relative is informed, the proband's privacy is protected by maximal deidentification, and the rights of the relative are met by a stepwise approach to informing that allows them to decide how much information they receive.

Citation

Parsons. (2020). From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 205 - 212. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106966

Acceptance Date Nov 16, 2020
Publication Date Dec 9, 2020
Journal Journal of Medical Ethics
Print ISSN 0306-6800
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Pages 205 - 212
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106966
Publisher URL https://jme.bmj.com/content/48/3/205