Outputs (7)

Mapping the Manifestations of Exclusion: Challenging the Incarceration of Queer People (2020)
Book Chapter
Emmerich, F., & Adams, F. (2020). Mapping the Manifestations of Exclusion: Challenging the Incarceration of Queer People. In The Queer Outside in UK Law (107-140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48830-7_5

Prisons are coercive spaces that strengthen and support the capitalist system. They are deeply gendered institutions that enforce a gender binary and perpetuate heteronormative gender performativity. These confinement spaces produce varieties of excl... Read More about Mapping the Manifestations of Exclusion: Challenging the Incarceration of Queer People.

Mapping the Manifestations of Exclusion: Challenging the Incarceration of Queer People (2020)
Book Chapter
Adams, F., & Emmerich, F. (2020). Mapping the Manifestations of Exclusion: Challenging the Incarceration of Queer People. In The Queer Outside in UK Law. (1). Springer

Prisons are coercive spaces that strengthen and support the capitalist system. They are deeply gendered institutions that enforce a gender binary and perpetuate heteronormative gender performativity. These confinement spaces produce varieties of excl... Read More about Mapping the Manifestations of Exclusion: Challenging the Incarceration of Queer People.

The GDPR and (Big) Health Data: Assessing the EU Legislator’s Choices (2020)
Book Chapter
(2020). The GDPR and (Big) Health Data: Assessing the EU Legislator’s Choices. In Health Data Privacy under the GDPR: Big Data Challenges and Regulatory Responses

This chapter critically examines the GDPR’s provisions relating to health by focusing on two main issues: i) the definitional uncertainties surrounding health data and, ii) the legislative choices regarding the balance between the competing interests... Read More about The GDPR and (Big) Health Data: Assessing the EU Legislator’s Choices.

Addressing Big Data and AI Challenges: A Taxonomy and Why the GDPR Cannot Provide a One-size-fits-all Solution (2020)
Book Chapter
(2020). Addressing Big Data and AI Challenges: A Taxonomy and Why the GDPR Cannot Provide a One-size-fits-all Solution. In Health Data Privacy under the GDPR: Big Data Challenges and Regulatory Responses

The chapter challenges the assumption that data privacy frameworks in general and the GDPR in particular can provide an appropriate regulatory solution for big data. It argues that in order to be able to properly reflect on regulatory approaches that... Read More about Addressing Big Data and AI Challenges: A Taxonomy and Why the GDPR Cannot Provide a One-size-fits-all Solution.

The Unexpected Consequences of the EU Right to Be Forgotten: Internet Search Engines as Fundamental Rights Adjudicators (2020)
Book Chapter
Tzanou, M. (2020). The Unexpected Consequences of the EU Right to Be Forgotten: Internet Search Engines as Fundamental Rights Adjudicators. In Personal Data Protection and Legal Developments in the European Union. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9489-5.ch014

The right to be forgotten as established in the CJEU's decision in Google Spain is the first online data privacy right recognized in the EU legal order. This contribution explores two currently underdeveloped in the literature aspects of the right to... Read More about The Unexpected Consequences of the EU Right to Be Forgotten: Internet Search Engines as Fundamental Rights Adjudicators.

‘That’s a bit of a minefield!’: Supported Decision-Making in Intellectually Disabled People’s Intimate Lives (2020)
Book Chapter
Harding, R., & Tascioglu, E. (2020). ‘That’s a bit of a minefield!’: Supported Decision-Making in Intellectually Disabled People’s Intimate Lives. In Research Handbook on Gender, Sexuality and the Law (256 - 270). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111157

In this chapter, we explore the issue of support for intellectually disabled people in developing intimate relationships within the constraints of the regulatory position set out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Throu... Read More about ‘That’s a bit of a minefield!’: Supported Decision-Making in Intellectually Disabled People’s Intimate Lives.

Who controls university legal education? The case of England and Wales (2020)
Book Chapter
(2020). Who controls university legal education? The case of England and Wales. In Imperatives for Legal Education Research: Then, Now and Tomorrow (143 -158)

Proceedings paper adapted from UNSW Conference on Research in Legal Education: State of the Art?, held at Sydney, Australia, 3-5 December 2017.