Oscillating magnetic field does not disrupt orientation in the presence of stellar cues in an avian migrant

Bojarinova, Julia; Kavokin, Kirill; Fedorishcheva, Aleksandra; Sannikov, Dmitriy; Cherbunin, Roman; Pakhomov, Alexander; Chernetsov, Nikita

Abstract

Weak oscillating magnetic fields (OMF) in the radiofrequency range are known to disrupt the orientation of birds. However, until now, it has not been experimentally verified that the sensitivity to OMF is a characteristic feature specifically of the magnetic compass and OMF does not influence the celestial compass system as well. Here we studied if OMF affected the star compass of a long-distance migrant, the Garden Warbler. The birds were tested under the natural starry sky under two different conditions: in the natural magnetic field (NMF) and in radiofrequency OMF with the amplitude 20nT and frequency 1.41 MHz (matching the Larmor frequency of a freestanding electron spin in the local NMF of 50,400 nT). This amplitude is about ten times higher than the sensitivity threshold to OMF shown for this species in previous studies. Our experimental results clearly demonstrated that OMF did not influence the celestial (star) compass system: with access to the starry sky garden warblers showed migratory orientation appropriate for autumn migratory season both in the NMF and in the OMF. Thus, the OMF effect is pertinent to the magnetic compass system, not to the avian orientation in general.

Citation

Bojarinova, J., Kavokin, K., Fedorishcheva, A., Sannikov, D., Cherbunin, R., Pakhomov, A., & Chernetsov, N. (2024). Oscillating magnetic field does not disrupt orientation in the presence of stellar cues in an avian migrant. Journal of Ornithology, 165(2), 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-023-02129-w

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Nov 13, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Nov 29, 2023
• Publication Date: 2024-04
• Deposit Date: Jan 16, 2025
• Journal: Journal of Ornithology
• Print ISSN: 2193-7192
• Electronic ISSN: 2193-7206
• Publisher: Springer
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 165
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 347-354
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-023-02129-w
• Public URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1048466
• Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10336-023-02129-w
• Additional Information: Received: 11 May 2023; Revised: 27 October 2023; Accepted: 3 November 2023; First Online: 29 November 2023; : ; : The authors declare no competing or financial interests.; : All animal procedures (in this case, capture of the birds and simple, non-invasive, behavioural experiments) were approved by the appropriate authorities: Permit 24/2018-06 by Kaliningrad Regional Agency for Protection, Reproduction, and Use of Animal World and Forests; and Permit #2–3/2022 (dated 24/02/2022) by the Bioethics Committee of Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry RAS. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The birds were released back into the wild after all experiments had been completed.