Right's Complex Relation to Ethics in Kant: the limits of Independentism

Baiasu

Abstract

The recent literature on the relation in Kant between duties of right and duties of virtue is dominated by a debate on whether duties of right can be derived from duties of virtue. According to one important argument, there is a tension or even a paradox in Kant between various claims concerning juridical norms, a paradox which can best be solved by assuming an “Independentist” position, that is, the view that the Universal Principle of Right is independent from the Categorical Imperative and, hence, that duties of right are normatively independent from duties of virtue. My claim in this paper is that the paradox which supports the independentist reading affects Kant’s claims only when the focus is on the subjective validity of duties. Once the focus is changed to objective validity, with which Kant is actually concerned, the paradox is dissolved and the Universal Principle of Right can appear as normatively dependent on the Categorical Imperative. In other words, in this paper, I argue that the scope of the paradox of juridical norms is confined to a specific focus and independentism (the view that duties of right are independent from duties of virtue) is confined in a similar way. Hence, the complexity of Kant’s account makes it possible for him to accommodate both independentist and dependentist views of the relation between right and virtue.

Citation

Baiasu. (2016). Right's Complex Relation to Ethics in Kant: the limits of Independentism. Kant-Studien: Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft, 107(1), 2 -33. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0002

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 7, 2015
• Online Publication Date: Mar 20, 2016
• Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016
• Journal: Kant Studien: philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft
• Print ISSN: 0022-8877
• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 107
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 2 -33
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0002
• Keywords: Universal Principle of Right; Categorical Imperative; duties of right; duties of virtue; paradox of juridical imperatives
• Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0002