Lockdown and levelling down: why Savulescu and Cameron are mistaken about selective isolation of the elderly.

Hughes

Abstract

In their recent article, 'Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong', Savulescu and Cameron argue for selective isolation of the elderly as an alternative to general lockdown. An important part of their argument is the claim that the latter amounts to 'levelling down equality' and that this is 'unethical' or even 'morally repugnant'. This response argues that they fail to justify either part of this claim: the claim that levelling down is always morally wrong is subject to challenges that Savulescu and Cameron do not consider; and a policy of maintaining general lockdown does not constitute levelling down, as it provides absolute benefits to those who would be worse off under selective isolation.

Citation

Hughes. (2020). Lockdown and levelling down: why Savulescu and Cameron are mistaken about selective isolation of the elderly. Journal of Medical Ethics, 722-723. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106776

• Acceptance Date: Aug 12, 2020
• Publication Date: Aug 26, 2020
• Journal: Journal of Medical Ethics
• Print ISSN: 0306-6800
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Pages: 722-723
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106776
• Keywords: public health ethics; public policy
• Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106776