"If we use the strength of diversity among researchers we can only improve the quality and impact of our research": Issues of equality, diversity, inclusion, and transparency in the process of applying for research funding

Bell, Angus; Biglino, Giovanni; Blackburn, Manuella; Brown, Josh; Bruce, Richard; Buckley Woods, Helen; Burnett, Carole; Clift, Kate; Couzin, Nina; Derrick, G. E.; Duncan, Lorna J.; Eyland, Sarah; Gooberman-Hill, Rachael; Harris, Siân; Jones, Annalisa Francesca; Jones, Phill; Kitou, Elisavet; Knipe, Duleeka; Maia Schlüssel, Michael; Meadows, Alice; Murphy, Fiona; Narayanan, M. S.; Netto, Anisha; Neville, Patricia; Penton-Voak, Ian; Quadflieg, Susanne; Thomson, Aleksandra; Phekoo, Karen; Ward, Rebecca; Warner, Sarah; Verghese, Vinod

Abstract

This paper sets out the recommendations that have emerged from a six-month-long exploration and discussion of the processes that take place before research is submitted for funding: the 'pre-award' environment. Our work concentrated on how this environment is experienced by researchers at all career stages and from a variety of backgrounds, demographics, and disciplines, as well as by research managers and research support professionals. In the later stages of our exploration, representatives from research funders were also involved in the discussions.

The primary component of this project was an analysis of pre-award activities and processes at UK universities, using information collated from workshops with researchers and research management and support staff. The findings of this analysis were presented as a workflow diagram, which was then used to surface issues relating to equality, diversity, inclusion, and transparency in context. The workflow diagram and the issues highlighted by it were used to structure discussions at a symposium for a range of research stakeholders, held in Bristol, UK, in January 2023. The recommendations set out in this paper are drawn from discussions that took place at that event.

This paper is not an exhaustive landscape analysis, nor a review of existing research and practice in the area of pre-award processes or of recent thinking on the topics of equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). Instead, it aims to summarise and encapsulate the suggestions put forward by the stakeholders during the symposium. These recommendations, from experienced professionals working in the field, are based on their encounters with the issues raised in the project. They do not solely relate to those working on pre-award processes, but may also apply to funders, policymakers, university leaders, and professional associations, since many of the challenges flagged in our research are systemic and cultural, and reach far beyond the research office.

Citation

Bell, A., Biglino, G., Blackburn, M., Brown, J., Bruce, R., Buckley Woods, H., …Verghese, V. (2023). "If we use the strength of diversity among researchers we can only improve the quality and impact of our research": Issues of equality, diversity, inclusion, and transparency in the process of applying for research funding. Elizabeth Blackwell Institute, University of Bristol, the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund, MoreBrains Cooperative

• Report Type: Research Report
• Online Publication Date: Jul 27, 2023
• Publication Date: Jul 27, 2023
• Deposit Date: Dec 12, 2023
• Publisher: Zenodo
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8186347
• Publisher URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10210812
• Additional Information: Older version; ; https://zenodo.org/records/8186347