Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials investigating exercise for individuals with whiplash-associated disorders; a systematic review.

Colombi, Andrea; Vedani, Silvia; Viceconti, Antonello; Stapleton, Claire

The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials investigating exercise for individuals with whiplash-associated disorders; a systematic review. Thumbnail


Authors

Andrea Colombi

Silvia Vedani

Antonello Viceconti



Abstract

Whiplash-associated disorders are a common sequela of road traffic accidents. Exercise therapy is considered an effective intervention, and it is recommended for the management of such condition. However, the application of research findings to everyday clinical practice is dependent on sufficient details being reported. To explore the quality of reporting in studies investigating the effectiveness of exercise for whiplash-associated disorders. A literature search was conducted to identify studies testing the effectiveness of exercise for whiplash-associated disorders. Two reporting checklists were used to evaluate reporting completeness. The median positive scores for each study and overall percentage of positive scores for each item were calculated. Percentage agreement and the Cohen's Kappa coefficient were calculated. Twenty-one studies were included. According to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist, items were reported appropriately with a median of 29% (range 0-95%, IQR 40.5). The median number of adequately reported items per study was 5 (range 1-10, IQR 3). For the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template checklist, items were reported appropriately with a median of 29% (range 0-57%, IQR 29). The median number of adequately reported items per study was 4 (range 0-16, IQR 8). Percentage agreement ranged from 57% to 100% while Cohen's Kappa from -0.17 to 1.00. The study reveals significant gaps in the quality of reporting in studies investigating exercise for whiplash-associated disorders as both checklists showed a median reporting adequacy of only 29%. Overall, the inter-rater agreement for both checklists was acceptable. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.]

Citation

Colombi, A., Vedani, S., Viceconti, A., & Stapleton, C. (2024). The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials investigating exercise for individuals with whiplash-associated disorders; a systematic review. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 73, Article 103145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103145

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 11, 2024
Online Publication Date Jul 14, 2024
Publication Date 2024-10
Deposit Date Sep 6, 2024
Publicly Available Date Oct 7, 2024
Journal Musculoskeletal science & practice
Print ISSN 2468-7812
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 73
Article Number 103145
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103145
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/881875

Files

The Quality Of Reporting In Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating Exercise For Individuals With Whiplash-associated Disorders; A Systematic Review. (70.8 Mb)
PDF

Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/






You might also like



Downloadable Citations