All Outputs (3)

Prescribed burning impacts on ecosystem services in the British uplands: A methodological critique of the EMBER project (2020)
Journal Article
Ashby, M., & Heinemeyer, A. (2020). Prescribed burning impacts on ecosystem services in the British uplands: A methodological critique of the EMBER project. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2112 - 2120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13476

Due to its novelty and scale, the EMBER project is a key study within the prescribed burning evidence base. However, it has several significant but overlooked methodological flaws. In this paper, we outline and discuss these flaws. In doing so, we a... Read More about Prescribed burning impacts on ecosystem services in the British uplands: A methodological critique of the EMBER project.

Peatland Protection. The Science: Four Key Reports (2020)
Journal Article
Ashby. (2020). Peatland Protection. The Science: Four Key Reports

Summary Fundamental changes to the evidence base now disagrees with previous science These changes should inform policy and any proposed regulation change, the England Peatland Strategy and Natural England’s position on restoration burning ? Burned... Read More about Peatland Protection. The Science: Four Key Reports.

GWCT Peatland Report 2020: A review of the environmental impacts, including carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions and wildfire on peatland in England associated with grouse moor management (2020)
Journal Article
Ashby. (2020). GWCT Peatland Report 2020: A review of the environmental impacts, including carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions and wildfire on peatland in England associated with grouse moor management