Craig A. Harper
Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire
Harper, Craig A.; Rhodes, Darren
Abstract
The moral foundations theory (MFT) is an influential multifactorial model that posits how decision-making in the moral context originates from a set of six intuitive moral foundations: care, fairness, authority, loyalty, purity, and liberty. The established measure of these foundations—the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ)—has been used extensively in a range of empirical projects. However, recent analyses of its factor structure and the internal consistency of each of the foundation clusters have called its validity into question. In this paper, data from a large sample of British voters were used to re-examine the factor structure of the MFQ. As opposed to a 6-factor structure, only three meaningful clusters emerged in an exploratory principal factors analysis (Study 1; N = 428): traditionalism, compassion, and liberty. This structure was broadly confirmed in an independent sample (Study 2; N = 322). Concurrent validity was established via correlations with measures of ‘social change’ and ‘systemic inequality’ insecurities (Study 1) and voting behaviour and preferences (Study 2). Significant differences on each of the three factors of the revised MFQ (MFQ-r) were observed between the voters of different political parties (Study 1) and sides of the Brexit issue (Study 2). Implications for moral foundations theory and its measurement are discussed.
Citation
Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2021). Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1303-1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12452
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 25, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 17, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021-10 |
Deposit Date | Dec 20, 2024 |
Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
Print ISSN | 0144-6665 |
Electronic ISSN | 2044-8309 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 60 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 1303-1329 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12452 |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1020196 |
Publisher URL | https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12452 |
Additional Information | Received: 2020-08-27; Published: 2021-02-17 |
You might also like
EXPRESS: Rapid calibration to dynamic temporal contexts
(2023)
Journal Article
Ideological responses to the breaking of COVID-19 social distancing recommendations
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search