Dr Laura Higson-Bliss l.a.higson-bliss@keele.ac.uk
Nothing has caused such legal conundrums for governments across the globe than the ‘harms’ associated with social media usage. Many of these ‘harms’ dominate news headlines, with the same cry, ‘there should be a law against that’. Governments have responded with ‘new’ legal provisions in a bid to make the online world a safer place, including the United Kingdom with the implementation of the Online Safety Act 2023. This complex piece of legislation predominately regulates online platforms, including social media companies. However, Part 10 of the Act creates ‘new’ criminal offences in a bid to make the UK one of the safest places to go online. This article critically examines two of these ‘new’ offences: (1) threatening communications and (2) false communications, drawing firstly on why it was thought necessary to create such provisions, before turning to examine the actus reus and mens rea of both offences. The article provides an academic critique of each provision, highlighting the main flaws with each offence and why, with examples, the provisions will not overcome many of the issues previously raised against their predecessors, most notably s.1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 and s.127(1) and (2) of the Communications Act 2003. The article suggests improvements which can be made to strengthen these ‘new’ offences.
Higson-Bliss, L. (2025). Legislative Comment: The Online Safety Act 2023 and the sending of threatening or false communications. Statute Law Review, 46(2), Article hmaf021. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmaf021
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 2, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 16, 2025 |
Publication Date | 2025-08 |
Deposit Date | May 14, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | May 14, 2025 |
Journal | Statute Law Review |
Print ISSN | 0144-3593 |
Electronic ISSN | 1464-3863 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 46 |
Issue | 2 |
Article Number | hmaf021 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmaf021 |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1233844 |
Publisher URL | https://academic.oup.com/slr/article/46/2/hmaf021/8203212 |
Acccepted Version
(542 Kb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright Statement
The final version of this accepted manuscript and all relevant information related to it, including copyrights, can be found on the publisher website.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Social Media, Criminal Law and Legality
(2024)
Book
Scotland’s hate crime law: the problem with using public order laws to govern online speech
(2024)
Digital Artefact
When can your boss fire you for social media use? An expert on the law explains
(2023)
Digital Artefact
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search