Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Effects of threshold inspiratory muscle trainer versus trigger sensitivity adjustment versus conventional therapy on respiratory function in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Abdeen, Heba A.A.; Atef, Hady; Elnahas, Nesreen G.; Khalaf, Omnia A.; Soliman, Youssef M.A.; Elkorashy, Reem I.M.; Mowad, Samah; Moreno-Segura, Noemi; Carrasco, Juan Jose; Marques-Sule, Elena

Authors

Heba A.A. Abdeen

Nesreen G. Elnahas

Omnia A. Khalaf

Youssef M.A. Soliman

Reem I.M. Elkorashy

Samah Mowad

Noemi Moreno-Segura

Juan Jose Carrasco

Elena Marques-Sule



Abstract

Background
Prolonged mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with severe complications, and then earlier weaning is desirable. Then, strategies such as inspiratory muscle training (IMT) have been studied. This study aimed to compare the effects of IMT via Threshold device versus trigger sensitivity adjustment of the mechanical ventilator versus conventional therapy on respiratory parameters on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease weaning patients.

Methods
Ninety patients (aged 50–70) with acute respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation selected from the Intensive Care Unit were randomly assigned into: IMT via Threshold and conventional physical therapy group; trigger sensitivity adjustment of the mechanical ventilator and conventional physical therapy group; and conventional physical therapy alone group. Negative inspiratory force (NIF), respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), pH, and oxygenation parameters (PaO2, PaCO2, and P/F ratio) were measured pre and post-treatment.

Results
Threshold group showed higher improvements in NIF than the trigger sensitivity adjustment group (p = 0.002; ES: 0.91). Threshold group showed better results in all measures than conventional physical therapy group except for pH and PaCO2. Trigger sensitivity adjustment and conventional physical therapy groups showed significant improvements in all measurements (p < 0.005 for NIF (2.30), RR (1.69), VT (0.80); RSBI (2.09), PaO2 (1.20), P/F ratio (1.22) except for VT, pH, and PaCO2 with preference to trigger sensitivity adjustment group. No significant differences were found in the percentage of weaning between groups, but Threshold group showed significantly lower weaning days than conventional physical therapy group (p = 0.004, ES:1.01).

Conclusion
The respiratory training with the IMT device has significantly higher improvements than the other techniques and reduces the weaning duration.

Citation

Abdeen, H. A., Atef, H., Elnahas, N. G., Khalaf, O. A., Soliman, Y. M., Elkorashy, R. I., Mowad, S., Moreno-Segura, N., Carrasco, J. J., & Marques-Sule, E. (2025). Effects of threshold inspiratory muscle trainer versus trigger sensitivity adjustment versus conventional therapy on respiratory function in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology, 337, Article 104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2025.104469

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 29, 2025
Online Publication Date Jul 5, 2025
Publication Date 2025-10
Deposit Date Jul 14, 2025
Journal Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
Print ISSN 1569-9048
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 337
Article Number 104469
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2025.104469
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1321877
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904825000801?via%3Dihub