Daniel Poole
EXPRESS: Can location cues facilitate attentional suppression?
Poole, Daniel; Grange, Jim; Milne, Elizabeth
Abstract
The spatial cueing paradigm has illustrated that location cues result in attentional enhancement of target stimuli. However, evidence is mixed on whether proactive attentional suppression can be cued in a similar way. In this registered report, we used a hybrid flanker-visual search-spatial cueing paradigm in which participants were presented with informative or non-informative cues regarding the upcoming location of a target-feature matching distractor in the search array. We aimed to replicate and extend a previous study which found evidence that cues support attentional suppression (Munneke, Van der Stigchel & Theeuwes, 2008. Acta Psychologia, 129 (1): 101 - 107). We repeated the experiment with informative and non-informative cue conditions blocked (Experiment 2) and with possible target and distractor locations separated (Experiment 3). Across all three experiments (total n = 554) we did not observe any evidence of cueing enhanced attentional suppression. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 3, participant responses were slightly slower in the informative cue condition, suggesting that the cue itself captured attention when cue-type was interleaved and thus unpredictable trial-to-trial. Surprisingly, post experiment assessment of distractor learning suggested participants had not learnt the association between cue and distractor location in any experiment. These findings do not support spatial cue enhanced attentional suppression.
Citation
Poole, D., Grange, J., & Milne, E. (in press). EXPRESS: Can location cues facilitate attentional suppression?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17470218251357942. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251357942
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 3, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 3, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Jul 21, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 4, 2025 |
Journal | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
Print ISSN | 1747-0218 |
Electronic ISSN | 1747-0226 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 17470218251357942 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251357942 |
Keywords | Suppression; Expectation; Cueing; Attention; Distractor |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1324481 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17470218251357942 |
Files
Accepted Manuscript
(5.6 Mb)
Document
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
The final version of this accepted manuscript and all relevant information related to it, including copyrights, can be found on the publisher website
You might also like
Rumination and inhibition in task switching: No evidence for an association
(2023)
Journal Article
Improving psychological science: further thoughts, reflections and ways forward
(2022)
Journal Article
A spurious correlation between difference scores in evidence-accumulation model parameters
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search