Alyn Lewis a.m.lewis@keele.ac.uk
Should General Practitioners Issue a Sick Certificate to Employees Who Consult for Low Back Pain in Primary Care?
Lewis, M; Wynne-Jones, G; Barton, P; Whitehurst, DG; Wathall, S; Foster, NE; Hay, E; Van Der Windt, D
Authors
Gwenllian Wynne-Jones g.wynne-jones@keele.ac.uk
P Barton
DG Whitehurst
S Wathall
NE Foster
Elaine Hay e.m.hay@keele.ac.uk
Danielle Van Der Windt d.van.der.windt@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Purpose Back pain is a common problem and has significant societal impact. Sickness certification is commonly issued to patients consulting their general practitioner with low back pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of certification for low back pain with clinical outcomes and cost consequences. Methods A prospective cohort study using linked questionnaire and medical record data from 806 low back pain patients in 8 UK general practices: comparison of 116 (14.4 %) who received a sickness certificate versus 690 who did not receive certification. The primary clinical measure was the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Data on back pain consultation and work absenteeism were used to calculate healthcare and societal costs. Results Participants issued a sickness certificate had higher back-related disability at baseline consultation and 6-month follow-up [mean difference 3.1 (95 % CI 1.8, 4.4) on the RMDQ], indicating worse health status. After fully adjusting for baseline differences, most changes in clinical outcomes at 6 months were not significantly different between study groups. Productivity losses were significantly higher for the certification group, with most absence occurring after the expected end of certification; mean difference in costs due to absenteeism over 6 months was £1,956 (95 % CI £941, £3040). Conclusions There was no clear evidence of a difference in clinical outcomes between individuals issued a sickness certificate and those not issued a certification for their back pain. With little overall contrast in clinical outcomes, policy makers and care providers may wish to draw on the likely difference in societal costs alongside issues in ethical and moral care in their consideration of patient care for low back pain.
Citation
Lewis, M., Wynne-Jones, G., Barton, P., Whitehurst, D., Wathall, S., Foster, N., …Van Der Windt, D. (2015). Should General Practitioners Issue a Sick Certificate to Employees Who Consult for Low Back Pain in Primary Care?. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 577 -588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9564-z
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 17, 2015 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | May 26, 2023 |
Journal | Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation |
Print ISSN | 1053-0487 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Pages | 577 -588 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9564-z |
Keywords | back pain, general practice, certification, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9564-z |
Files
Should General Practitioners Issue a Sick Certificate to Employees Who Consult for Low Back Pain in Primary Care?.pdf
(703 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Why GPs must not lose their role in supporting people back to work.
(2022)
Journal Article
Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: Patient characteristics and outcomes
(2021)
Conference Proceeding
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search