James Grange j.a.grange@keele.ac.uk
Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching?
Grange, James
Authors
Abstract
In task switching, extending the response-cue interval (RCI) reduces the switch cost--the detriment to performance when switching compared to repeating tasks. This reduction has been used as evidence for the existence of task-set decay processes. Recently, this has been challenged by the observation of sequential dependencies on the RCI effect: switch cost is only reduced at longer RCIs when the previous trial had a short RCI. This trial-wise variation of RCI is thought to affect the temporal distinctiveness (TD) of a previous task's episodic trace, affecting the probability of its automatic retrieval on the current trial; importantly, TD is thought to be independent of the current trial's RCI. The present study highlights a dependency between the current RCI and TD, and demonstrates that a decay model can reproduce some patterns of data attributed to TD. Further, the decay account makes a strong prediction when TD is held constant: repetition response times should slow as the RCI increases, and switch response times should be facilitated. This prediction was tested via re-analysis of extant data and three experiments. The re-analysis provided some evidence for the decay account, but Experiments 1 and 2 report slowing for task repetition and switch trials, which cannot be explained by a task-set decay process. Experiment 3, which utilized tasks requiring perceptual judgements, showed small evidence for decay. We conclude that the data are largely consistent with the TD account and that the evidence for decay of higher-level task-sets is not convincing.
Citation
Grange, J. (2014). Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19 -45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.934696
Acceptance Date | Jun 8, 2014 |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jul 16, 2014 |
Journal | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology |
Print ISSN | 1747-0218 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Pages | 19 -45 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.934696 |
Keywords | task switching, decay, temporal distinctiveness |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/405885 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.934696 |
Files
Grange & Cross (2015).pdf
(834 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
UKRN Open Research Training Resources and Priorities Working Paper
(2023)
Working Paper
Rumination and inhibition in task switching: No evidence for an association
(2023)
Journal Article
Improving psychological science: further thoughts, reflections and ways forward
(2022)
Journal Article
The evolution of primate short-term memory
(2022)
Journal Article
A spurious correlation between difference scores in evidence-accumulation model parameters
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search