Professor Krysia Dziedzic k.s.dziedzic@keele.ac.uk
Implementing core NICE guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation (MOSAICS): A cluster randomised controlled trial
Dziedzic, K; Hay, E; Porcheret, M; Afolabi, EK; Lewis, A; Morden, A; Jinks, C; McHugh, GA; Ryan, S; Finney, A; Main, C; Edwards, JJ; Paskins, Z; Pushpa-Rajah, A; Healey, E
Authors
Elaine Hay e.m.hay@keele.ac.uk
M Porcheret
EK Afolabi
Alyn Lewis a.m.lewis@keele.ac.uk
A Morden
Clare Jinks c.jinks@keele.ac.uk
GA McHugh
S Ryan
Andrew Finney a.finney@keele.ac.uk
C Main
Joanne Edwards j.edwards1@keele.ac.uk
Zoe Paskins z.paskins@keele.ac.uk
A Pushpa-Rajah
Emma Healey e.healey@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Objective
To determine the effectiveness of a model osteoarthritis consultation, compared with usual care, on physical function and uptake of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) osteoarthritis recommendations, in adults =45 years consulting with peripheral joint pain in UK general practice.
Method
Two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with baseline health survey. Eight general practices in England. Participants: 525 adults =45 years consulting for peripheral joint pain, amongst 28,443 population survey recipients. Four intervention practices delivered the model osteoarthritis consultation to patients consulting with peripheral joint pain; four control practices continued usual care.
The primary clinical outcome of the trial was the SF-12 physical component score (PCS) at 6 months; the main secondary outcome was uptake of NICE core recommendations by 6 months, measured by osteoarthritis quality indicators. A Linear Mixed Model was used to analyse clinical outcome data (SF-12 PCS). Differences in quality indicator outcomes were assessed using logistic regression.
Results
525 eligible participants were enrolled (mean age 67.3 years, SD 10.5; 59.6% female): 288 from intervention and 237 from control practices. There were no statistically significant differences in SF-12 PCS: mean difference at the 6-month primary endpoint was -0.37 (95% CI -2.32, 1.57). Uptake of core NICE recommendations by 6 months was statistically significantly higher in the intervention arm compared with control: e.g., increased written exercise information, 20.5% (7.9, 28.3).
Conclusion
Whilst uptake of core NICE recommendations was increased, there was no evidence of benefit of this intervention, as delivered in this pragmatic randomised trial, on the primary outcome of physical functioning at 6 months.
Citation
Dziedzic, K., Hay, E., Porcheret, M., Afolabi, E., Lewis, A., Morden, A., …Healey, E. (2018). Implementing core NICE guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation (MOSAICS): A cluster randomised controlled trial. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 26(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.09.010
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 26, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 14, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2018-01 |
Journal | Osteoarthritis and Cartilage |
Print ISSN | 1063-4584 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 26 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 43-53 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.09.010 |
Keywords | osteoarthritis, primary care, implementation, NICE guidelines, self-management, quality indicators |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.09.010 |
Files
K Dziedzic - Implementing core nice guideline for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation....pdf
(906 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Our new podcast will open up roles and career paths
(2023)
Journal Article
Embedding group consultations into practice: Perceptions of the general practice workforce
(2021)
Journal Article
Embedding group consultations into practice: Perceptions of the general practice workforce
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search