Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Methodology over metrics: Current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society.

Methodology over metrics: Current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society. Thumbnail


Covid-19 research made it painfully clear that the scandal of poor medical research, as denounced by Altman in 1994, persists today. The overall quality of medical research remains poor, despite longstanding criticisms. The problems are well known, but the research community fails to properly address them. We suggest most problems stem from an underlying paradox: although methodology is undeniably the backbone of qualitative and responsible research, science consistently undervalues methodology. The focus remains more on the destination (research claims and metrics) than on the journey. Notwithstanding, research should serve society more than the reputation of those involved. While we notice that many initiatives are being established to improve components of the research cycle, these initiatives are too disjointed. The overall system is monolithic and slow to adapt. We assert that a top-down action is needed from journals, universities, funders and governments to break the cycle and put methodology first. These actions should involve the widespread adoption of registered reports, balanced research funding between innovative, incremental and methodological research projects, full recognition and demystification of peer review, mandatory statistical review of reports, adherence to reporting guidelines, and investment in methodological education and research. Currently, the scientific enterprise is doing a major disservice to patients and society.

Acceptance Date May 25, 2021
Publication Date May 30, 2021
Journal Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Print ISSN 0895-4356
Publisher Elsevier
Pages 219-226
Keywords research quality; methodology; reporting
Publisher URL


Downloadable Citations