Improvidence, Precaution, and the Logical-Empirical Disconnect in UK Health Policy.

Parsons, Jordan Alexander

Abstract

The last decade has seen significant developments in UK health policy, with are largely claimed to be evidence based. However, such a characterisation ought, in many cases, to be questioned. Policies can be broadly understood as based primarily on either a logical or empirical case. In the absence of relevant empirical evidence, policymakers understandably appeal to logical cases. Once such evidence is available, however, it can inform policy and enable the logical case to be set aside. Such a linear policy process is not always the reality, and logical cases often continue to guide policy decisions in direct opposition to empirical evidence. In this paper, I discuss two recent examples of this disconnect between logical and empirical cases in UK health policy. The first-organ donation-illustrates an example of a significant policy change being made in opposition to the evidence. I refer to this as the improvidence approach. The second-abortion-provides an example of policymakers not making a change that has extensive supporting data. I refer to this using the more recognisable language of the precautionary approach. Ultimately, I argue that both the improvidence and precautionary approaches are examples of problematic public policy where policymakers provide no explicit justification for going against the evidence.

Citation

Parsons, J. A. (2022). Improvidence, Precaution, and the Logical-Empirical Disconnect in UK Health Policy. Health Care Analysis, 1 - 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-022-00450-8

• Acceptance Date: Nov 17, 2022
• Publication Date: Dec 26, 2022
• Journal: Health Care Analysis
• Print ISSN: 1065-3058
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• Pages: 1 - 20
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-022-00450-8
• Public URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/426133
• Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10728-022-00450-8
• Additional Information: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.