Bio-impedance spectroscopy added to a fluid management protocol does not improve preservation of residual kidney function in incident hemodialysis patients in a randomized controlled trial

Davies, Simon J.; Coyle, David; Lindley, Elizabeth J.; Keane, David; Belcher, John; Caskey, Fergus J.; Dasgupta, Indranil; Davenport, Andrew; Farrington, Ken; Mitra, Sandip; Ormandy, Paula; Wilkie, Martin; Macdonald, Jamie; Zanganeh, Mandana; Andronis, Lazaros; Solis-Trapala, Ivonne; Sim, Julius

Abstract

Avoiding excessive dialysis-associated volume depletion may help preserve residual kidney function (RKF). To establish whether knowledge of the estimated normally hydrated weight from bioimpedance measurements (BI-NHW) when setting the post-hemodialysis target weight (TW) might mitigate rate of loss of RKF, we undertook an open label, randomized controlled trial in incident patients receiving HD, with clinicians and patients blinded to bioimpedance readings in controls. A total of 439 patients with over 500 ml urine/day or residual GFR exceeding 3 ml/min/1.73m2 were recruited from 34 United Kingdom centers and randomized 1:1, stratified by center. Fluid assessments were made for up to 24 months using a standardized proforma in both groups, supplemented by availability of BI-NHW in the intervention group. Primary outcome was time to anuria, analyzed using competing-risk survival models adjusted for baseline characteristics, by intention to treat. Secondary outcomes included rate of RKF decline (mean urea and creatinine clearance), blood pressure and patient-reported outcomes. There were no group differences in cause-specific hazard rates of anuria (0.751; 95% confidence interval (0.459, 1.229)) or sub-distribution hazard rates (0.742 (0.453, 1.215)). RKF decline was markedly slower than anticipated, pooled linear rates in year 1: –0.178 (–0.196, –0.159)), year 2: –0.061 (–0.086, –0.036)) ml/min/1.73m2/month. Blood pressure and patient reported outcomes did not differ by group. The mean difference agreement between TW and BI-NHW was similar for both groups, Bioimpedance: –0.04 kg; Control: –0.25 kg. Thus, use of a standardized clinical protocol for fluid assessment when setting TW is associated with excellent preservation of RKF. Hence, bioimpedance measurements are not necessary to achieve this.

Citation

Davies, S. J., Coyle, D., Lindley, E. J., Keane, D., Belcher, J., Caskey, F. J., …Sim, J. (2023). Bio-impedance spectroscopy added to a fluid management protocol does not improve preservation of residual kidney function in incident hemodialysis patients in a randomized controlled trial. Kidney International, 104(3), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.05.016

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: May 18, 2023
• Online Publication Date: May 30, 2023
• Publication Date: 2023
• Deposit Date: Jun 7, 2023
• Journal: Kidney International
• Print ISSN: 0085-2538
• Electronic ISSN: 1523-1755
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 104
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 587-598
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.05.016
• Keywords: anuria; bioimpedance spectroscopy; blood pressure; fluid status; patient-reported outcomes; residual kidney function
• Public URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/442675
• Publisher URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085253823003940?via%3Dihub
• Additional Information: This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Bio-impedance spectroscopy added to a fluid management protocol does not improve preservation of residual kidney function in incident hemodialysis patients in a randomized controlled trial; Journal Title: Kidney International; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.05.016; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.