F. Manning
ACCEPTABILITY OF BISPHOSPHONATE TREATMENT REGIMENS FOR OSTEOPOROSIS: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Manning, F.; Paskins, Z.; Jinks, C.; Cotterell, E.; Sahota, O.; Bishop, S.; Wright, J.; Corp, N.
Authors
Zoe Paskins z.paskins@keele.ac.uk
Clare Jinks c.jinks@keele.ac.uk
E. Cotterell
O. Sahota
S. Bishop
J. Wright
Nadia Corp n.corp@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the acceptability of different bisphosphonates treatment regimens for osteoporosis among patients and clinicians.
Methods: A systematic review of qualitative research exploring patients’ and clinicians’ views of the acceptability of bisphosphonates was conducted (PROSPERO [CRD42019143526]). Seven databases were searched. Article screening used eligibility criteria. Eligible full-text articles underwent data extraction and quality appraisal (CASP) by two independent reviewers. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) informed a framework analysis.
Results: 25 studies were included, the majority were conducted in North America or Europe, 12 studies explored patient views, 7 clinicians and 6 explored both. Only two studies mentioned intravenous bisphosphonates. Acceptability was described according to TFA domains of sense-making, emotions, opportunity costs, burden, perceived effectiveness and self efficacy. There were limited data relating the TFA domain of ethicality. Patients and clinicians made sense of bisphosphonates by considering a risk-benefit analysis, informed by perceived-need balanced against concerns and fears. Both need and concern changed over time and were influenced by the doctor-patient relationship, personal and vicarious experience and competing priorities. Patients and clinicians wanted evidence of effectiveness and expressed uncertainty about how treatment worked. Patients’ self-efficacy was enhanced by routinisation (e.g., weekly tablet taken whilst reading the Sunday paper).
Conclusion: By utilising the TFA, the findings demonstrate that a whole system, theoretically informed approach is necessary to both understand and improve acceptability. Additionally, there is a need to clarify what constitutes bisphosphonate treatment success and a need to explore views of patients receiving IV bisphosphonates.
Citation
Manning, F., Paskins, Z., Jinks, C., Cotterell, E., Sahota, O., Bishop, S., Wright, J., & Corp, N. (2021, August). ACCEPTABILITY OF BISPHOSPHONATE TREATMENT REGIMENS FOR OSTEOPOROSIS: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Poster presented at World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (WCO-IOF-ESCEO 2020)
Presentation Conference Type | Poster |
---|---|
Conference Name | World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (WCO-IOF-ESCEO 2020) |
Start Date | Aug 20, 2021 |
End Date | Aug 22, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Jun 19, 2023 |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/485200 |
Publisher URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-020-05696-3 |
Additional Information | Abstract number; P1058, page; S524 |