Anna E. Winterbottom
Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision AID (YODDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study across 6 Predialysis Services
Winterbottom, Anna E.; Gavaruzzi, Teresa; Mooney, Andrew; Wilkie, Martin; Davies, Simon J.; Crane, Dennis; Tupling, Ken; Baxter, Paul D.; Meads, David M.; Mathers, Nigel; Bekker, Hilary L.
Authors
Teresa Gavaruzzi
Andrew Mooney
Martin Wilkie
Simon Davies s.j.davies@keele.ac.uk
Dennis Crane
Ken Tupling
Paul D. Baxter
David M. Meads
Nigel Mathers
Hilary L. Bekker
Abstract
Background
Patients are satisfied with their kidney care but want more support in making dialysis choices. Predialysis leaflets vary across services, with few being sufficient to enable patients’ informed decision making. We describe the acceptability of a patient decision aid and feasibility of evaluating its effectiveness within usual predialysis practice.
Methods
Prospective non-randomized comparison design, Usual Care or Usual Care Plus Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid Booklet (+YoDDA), in 6 referral centers (Yorkshire-Humber, UK) for patients with sustained deterioration of kidney function. Consenting (C) patients completed questionnaires after predialysis consultation (T1), and 6 weeks later (T2). Measures assessed YoDDA's utility to support patients’ decisions and integration within usual care.
Results
Usual Care (n = 105) and +YoDDA (n = 84) participant characteristics were similar: male (62%), white (94%), age (mean = 62.6; standard deviation [SD] 14.4), kidney disease severity (glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] mean = 14.7; SD 3.7); decisional conflict was < 25; choice-preference for home versus hospital dialysis approximately 50:50. Patients valued receiving YoDDA, reading it on their own (96%), and sharing it with family (72%). The +YoDDA participants had higher scores for understanding kidney disease, reasoning about options, feeling in control, sharing their decision with family. Study engagement varied by center (estimated range 14 – 49%; mean 45%); participants varied in completion of decision quality measures.
Conclusions
Receiving YoDDA as part of predialysis education was valued and useful to patients with worsening kidney disease. Integrating YoDDA actively within predialysis programs will meet clinical guidelines and patient need to support dialysis decision making in the context of patients’ lifestyle.
Citation
Winterbottom, A. E., Gavaruzzi, T., Mooney, A., Wilkie, M., Davies, S. J., Crane, D., …Bekker, H. L. (2016). Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision AID (YODDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study across 6 Predialysis Services. Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 36(4), 374-381. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2014.00274
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jul 1, 2016 |
Publication Date | 2016-07 |
Deposit Date | Nov 29, 2023 |
Journal | Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis |
Print ISSN | 0896-8608 |
Electronic ISSN | 1718-4304 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 374-381 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2014.00274 |
Keywords | Nephrology; General Medicine |
You might also like
An update on absolute and relative indications for dialysis treatment modalities
(2023)
Journal Article
Salt and Water Balance
(2022)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search