Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Efficacy and safety of the new generation Watchman FLX device compared to the Watchman 2.5: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Najim, Mostafa; Reda Mostafa, Mostafa; Eid, Mohamed Magdi; Alabdouh, Ahmad; Awad, Ahmed K; Elbanna, Mostafa; Mohamed, Sarah; Alweis, Richard; Al-Azizi, Karim M; Mamas, Mamas A

Authors

Mostafa Najim

Mostafa Reda Mostafa

Mohamed Magdi Eid

Ahmad Alabdouh

Ahmed K Awad

Mostafa Elbanna

Sarah Mohamed

Richard Alweis

Karim M Al-Azizi



Abstract

The first-generation Watchman 2.5 (W 2.5) presented several limitations, such as challenges in implantation within complex left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomies, higher incidence of peri-device leak, device recapture, and device-related thrombus (DRT). The newer generation Watchman FLX (W-FLX) was introduced with a modified design aiming to overcome these limitations. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to conduct a comparative assessment of the safety and efficacy of the W-FLX and 2.5 devices in clinical practice. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA). Studies were located through a search strategy utilizing PubMed, Cochrane, Google scholar and MEDLINE from inception to March 2023, with a primary objective to compare the safety and efficacy of the W-FLX and W 2.5 devices. After applying the selection criteria, five studies were included in this analysis. The analysis included five studies comprising 54,727 patients. The W-FLX is associated with an increase in procedural success (OR 7.49 [95% CI 1.98-28.26, P = 0.02; = 0%]), and a significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.51-0.54, P<0.01; = 0%], major bleeding 0.57 [95% CI 0.51-0.64, P<0.01; = 0%]), device embolism (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.18-0.70, P = 0.02; = 0%]), and pericardial effusion (OR 0.33 [95% CI 0.26-0.41, P<0.01; = 0%]). The rates of DRT and stroke were similar between the two groups. Compared to the W 2.5, the W-FLX was associated with a higher procedural success rate and significantly reduced adverse outcomes including mortality, major bleeding, device embolization, and pericardial effusion. [Abstract copyright: AJCD Copyright © 2023.]

Citation

Najim, M., Reda Mostafa, M., Eid, M. M., Alabdouh, A., Awad, A. K., Elbanna, M., Mohamed, S., Alweis, R., Al-Azizi, K. M., & Mamas, M. A. (in press). Efficacy and safety of the new generation Watchman FLX device compared to the Watchman 2.5: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease, 13(5), 291-299

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 31, 2023
Online Publication Date Oct 15, 2023
Deposit Date Dec 18, 2023
Publicly Available Date Dec 18, 2023
Journal American journal of cardiovascular disease
Electronic ISSN 2160-200X
Publisher e-Century Publishing
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 13
Issue 5
Pages 291-299
Keywords left atrial appendage occlusion, Watchman, Left atrial appendage closure, new generation Watchman
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/669830
Publisher URL https://e-century.us/files/ajcd/13/5/ajcd0151504.pdf
Related Public URLs https://e-century.us/web/journal_toc.php?journal=ajcd&volume=13&number=5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658049/

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations