Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Reforming further education: the changing labour process for college lecturers

Mather, Kim; Worrall, Les; Seifert, Roger

Authors

Kim Mather

Les Worrall

Roger Seifert



Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this article is to examine how the labour process of further education lecturers has changed as a result of legislative reforms introduced in the early 1990s.

Design/methodology/approach
The paper draws on labour process theory and emergent perspectives on “the new public management” to provide theoretical frameworks. Evidence is derived from research carried out at three FE colleges in the English West Midlands involving interviews with managers and lecturing staff, documentary material and a survey of lecturing staff employed in the colleges.

Findings
Market‐based reforms in this sector have resulted in the intensification and extensification of work effort for lecturers. This paper argues that these changes have been driven by the ideological underpinning of the reform process. Individual and collective acts of lecturer resistance have been insufficiently strong to prevent change from occurring and worker alienation has increased.

Research limitations/implications
The case study method renders generalisability of findings difficult. Comparative studies in other localities and sectors are needed.

Practical implications
The research indicates that the “new managerialism” – which has developed in the public sector – has created an increasingly alienated workforce and that the processes of change in many institutions have had negative outcomes.

Originality/value
The research demonstrates and application of labour process theory, supported by empirical evidence, as a means for examining the changing experiences of a group of public sector workers and assessing the effect of the “new managerialism” on workers' experiences.

Citation

Mather, K., Worrall, L., & Seifert, R. (2007). Reforming further education: the changing labour process for college lecturers. Personnel Review, 36(1), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710716740

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 9, 2005
Online Publication Date Jan 2, 2007
Publication Date Jan 2, 2007
Deposit Date Jan 31, 2024
Journal Personnel Review
Print ISSN 0048-3486
Publisher Emerald
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 36
Issue 1
Pages 109-127
DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710716740
Keywords Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management; Applied Psychology
Publisher URL https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00483480710716740/full/html