Adam W A Geraghty
Distinguishing emotional distress from mental disorder: A qualitative exploration of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).
Geraghty, Adam W A; Holt, Sian; Chew-Graham, Carolyn A; Santer, Miriam; Moore, Michael; Kendrick, Tony; Terluin, Berend; Little, Paul; Stuart, Beth; Mistry, Manoj; Richards, Al; Smith, Debs; Newman, Sonia; Rathod, Shanaya; Bowers, Hannah; van Marwijk, Harm
Authors
Sian Holt
Carolyn Chew-Graham c.a.chew-graham@keele.ac.uk
Miriam Santer
Michael Moore
Tony Kendrick
Berend Terluin
Paul Little
Beth Stuart
Manoj Mistry
Al Richards
Debs Smith
Sonia Newman
Shanaya Rathod
Hannah Bowers
Harm van Marwijk
Abstract
Primary care clinicians see people experiencing the full range of mental health problems. Determining when symptoms reflect disorder is complex. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) uniquely distinguishes general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders. It may support diagnostic conversations and targeting of treatment. We aimed to explore peoples' experiences of completing the 4DSQ and their perceptions of their resulting score profile across distress, depression, anxiety and physical symptoms. A qualitative study conducted in the UK with people recruited from primary care and community settings. Participants completed the 4DSQ then took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. They were interviewed about their experience of completing the 4DSQ, their perceptions of their scores across four dimensions, and the perceived utility if used with a clinician. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analysed thematically. Twenty-four interviews were conducted. Most participants found the 4DSQ easy to complete and reported that scores across the four dimensions aligned well with their symptom experience. Distinct scores for distress, depression and anxiety appeared to support improved self-understanding. Some valued the opportunity to discuss their scores and provide relevant context. Many felt the use of the 4DSQ with clinicians would be helpful and likely to support treatment decisions, although some were concerned about time-limited consultations. Distinguishing general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders aligned well with people's experience of symptoms. Use of the 4DSQ as part of mental health consultations may support targeting of treatment and personalisation of care. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2024, The Authors.]
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 11, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 18, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Apr 9, 2024 |
Journal | The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners |
Print ISSN | 0960-1643 |
Publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Article Number | BJGP.2023.0574 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0574 |
You might also like
Research Paper of the Year: relevance to the broader primary care team.
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search