Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Distinguishing emotional distress from mental disorder: A qualitative exploration of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).

Geraghty, Adam W A; Holt, Sian; Chew-Graham, Carolyn A; Santer, Miriam; Moore, Michael; Kendrick, Tony; Terluin, Berend; Little, Paul; Stuart, Beth; Mistry, Manoj; Richards, Al; Smith, Debs; Newman, Sonia; Rathod, Shanaya; Bowers, Hannah; van Marwijk, Harm

Authors

Adam W A Geraghty

Sian Holt

Miriam Santer

Michael Moore

Tony Kendrick

Berend Terluin

Paul Little

Beth Stuart

Manoj Mistry

Al Richards

Debs Smith

Sonia Newman

Shanaya Rathod

Hannah Bowers

Harm van Marwijk



Abstract

Primary care clinicians see people experiencing the full range of mental health problems. Determining when symptoms reflect disorder is complex. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) uniquely distinguishes general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders. It may support diagnostic conversations and targeting of treatment. We aimed to explore peoples' experiences of completing the 4DSQ and their perceptions of their resulting score profile across distress, depression, anxiety and physical symptoms. A qualitative study conducted in the UK with people recruited from primary care and community settings. Participants completed the 4DSQ then took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. They were interviewed about their experience of completing the 4DSQ, their perceptions of their scores across four dimensions, and the perceived utility if used with a clinician. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analysed thematically. Twenty-four interviews were conducted. Most participants found the 4DSQ easy to complete and reported that scores across the four dimensions aligned well with their symptom experience. Distinct scores for distress, depression and anxiety appeared to support improved self-understanding. Some valued the opportunity to discuss their scores and provide relevant context. Many felt the use of the 4DSQ with clinicians would be helpful and likely to support treatment decisions, although some were concerned about time-limited consultations. Distinguishing general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders aligned well with people's experience of symptoms. Use of the 4DSQ as part of mental health consultations may support targeting of treatment and personalisation of care. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2024, The Authors.]

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 11, 2024
Online Publication Date Mar 18, 2024
Deposit Date Apr 9, 2024
Journal The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Print ISSN 0960-1643
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Article Number BJGP.2023.0574
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0574