Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Complex PCI: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hamed, Mohamed; Mohamed, Sheref; Mahmoud, Mohamed; Kahan, Jonathan; Mohsen, Amr; Rahman, Faisal; Kayani, Waleed; Alfonso, Fernando; Brilakis, Emmanuel S; Elgendy, Islam Y; Mamas, Mamas A; Elbadawi, Ayman

Authors

Mohamed Hamed

Sheref Mohamed

Mohamed Mahmoud

Jonathan Kahan

Amr Mohsen

Faisal Rahman

Waleed Kayani

Fernando Alfonso

Emmanuel S Brilakis

Islam Y Elgendy

Ayman Elbadawi



Abstract

Trials evaluating the role of intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary artery disease have yielded mixed results. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of intravascular imaging specifically intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with those from conventional coronary angiography in complex PCI. Comprehensive electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed until March 2023 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing intravascular imaging with coronary angiography in patients undergoing complex PCI. Complex PCI was defined per each study, and included PCI for American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) type B2/C lesions, unprotected left main coronary artery disease, or multivessel stenting. The primary study outcome was major adverse clinical events (MACE). The meta-analysis included 10 RCTs with a total of 6615 patients (3576 in the intravascular imaging group and 3039 in the coronary angiography group). The weighted mean-follow up was 28.9 months. Compared with coronary angiography, intravascular imaging reduced MACE (8% vs. 13.3%; relative risk [RR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.73), cardiac death (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.31-0.73), definite/probable stent thrombosis (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.97), target vessel revascularization (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.83), and target lesion revascularization (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47-0.79). There was no difference between both groups in all-cause death (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.53-1.18) and myocardial infarction (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.61-1.04). In patients undergoing complex PCI, intravascular imaging-specifically IVUS-reduced MACE by decreasing the incidence of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, and target vessel and target lesion revascularization. [Abstract copyright: © 2024. The Author(s).]

Citation

Hamed, M., Mohamed, S., Mahmoud, M., Kahan, J., Mohsen, A., Rahman, F., …Elbadawi, A. (in press). Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Complex PCI: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cardiology and Therapy, 13(2), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-024-00364-7

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 4, 2024
Online Publication Date Apr 17, 2024
Deposit Date May 9, 2024
Journal Cardiology and therapy
Print ISSN 2193-8261
Electronic ISSN 2193-6544
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 13
Issue 2
Pages 379-399
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-024-00364-7
Keywords Intravascular imaging, IVUS, CA, Complex PCI, PCI
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/823701