Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Exploring enablers and inhibitors of AI‐enabled drones for manufacturing process audits: A mixed‐method approach

Shankar, Amit; Behl, Abhishek; Pereira, Vijay; Chavan, Meena; Chirico, Francesco

Authors

Amit Shankar

Vijay Pereira

Meena Chavan

Francesco Chirico



Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore the enablers and inhibitors of AI-enabled drone adoption for manufacturing process audit using a mixed-method design. A qualitative study was performed to explore the enablers and inhibitors. Further, based on the findings of the qualitative studies, a framework was proposed, and proposed hypotheses were examined using a survey-based study. The results indicated that function, environmental, and epistemic values are major enablers, whereas vulnerability and sunk cost barriers are major inhibitors to adoption intention. The initial trust and inertia were crucial mediators, and organizations' technological innovativeness played a crucial moderating role. This study enriches the literature on technological adoption for sustainability and helps audit service providers design strategies to enhance AI-enabled drone adoption for process audits.

Citation

Shankar, A., Behl, A., Pereira, V., Chavan, M., & Chirico, F. (2024). Exploring enablers and inhibitors of AI‐enabled drones for manufacturing process audits: A mixed‐method approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3679

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 20, 2023
Online Publication Date Jan 11, 2024
Publication Date Jan 11, 2024
Deposit Date Jun 24, 2024
Journal Business Strategy and the Environment
Print ISSN 0964-4733
Electronic ISSN 1099-0836
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3679
Keywords AI-enabled drone, Industry 4.0, innovation resistance theory, mixed-method approach, processaudit, theory of consumpt
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/855823
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.3679