Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention with and without telephone support in primary care (SupportBack 2): a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness

Geraghty, Adam W.A. ; Becque, Taeko; Roberts, Lisa C.; Hill, Jonathan C.; Foster, Nadine E.; Yardley, Lucy; Stuart, Beth; Turner, David A.; Hay, Elaine; Griffiths, Gareth; Webley, Frances; Durcan, Lorraine; Morgan, Alannah; Hughes, Stephanie; Bathers, Sarah; Butler-Walley, Stephanie; Wathall, Simon; Mansell, Gemma; White, Malcolm; Davies, Firoza; Little, Paul

Authors

Adam W.A. Geraghty

Taeko Becque

Lisa C. Roberts

Nadine E. Foster

Lucy Yardley

Beth Stuart

David A. Turner

Gareth Griffiths

Frances Webley

Lorraine Durcan

Alannah Morgan

Stephanie Hughes

Sarah Bathers

Stephanie Butler-Walley

Gemma Mansell

Malcolm White

Firoza Davies

Paul Little



Abstract

Background
Low back pain is prevalent and a leading cause of disability. We aimed to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an accessible, scalable internet intervention for supporting behavioural self-management (SupportBack).

Methods
Participants in UK primary care with low back pain without serious spinal pathology were randomly assigned 1:1:1 using computer algorithms stratified by disability level and telephone-support centre to usual care, usual care and SupportBack, or usual care and SupportBack with physiotherapist telephone-support (three brief calls). The primary outcome was low back pain-related disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] score) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months using a repeated measures model, analysed by intention to treat using 97·5% CIs. A parallel economic evaluation from a health services perspective was used to estimate cost-effectiveness. People with lived experience of low back pain were involved in this trial from the outset. This completed trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN14736486.

Findings
Between Nov 29, 2018, and Jan 12, 2021, 825 participants were randomly assigned (274 to usual care, 275 to SupportBack only, 276 to SupportBack with telephone-support). Participants had a mean age of 54 (SD 15), 479 (58%) of 821 were women and 342 (42%) were men, and 591 (92%) of 641 were White. Follow-up rates were 687 (83%) at 6 weeks, 598 (73%) at 3 months, 589 (72%) at 6 months, and 652 (79%) at 12 months. For the primary analysis, 736 participants were analysed (249 usual care, 245 SupportBack, and 242 SupportBack with telephone support). At a significance level of 0·025, there was no difference in RMDQ over 12 months with SupportBack versus usual care (adjusted mean difference –0·5 [97·5% CI –1·2 to 0·2]; p=0·085) or SupportBack with telephone-support versus usual care (–0·6 [–1·2 to 0·1]; p=0·048). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. The economic evaluation showed that the SupportBack group dominated usual care, being both more effective and less costly. Both interventions were likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per quality adjusted life year compared with usual care.

Interpretation
The SupportBack internet interventions did not significantly reduce low back pain-related disability over 12 months compared with usual care. They were likely to be cost-effective and safe. Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety should be considered together when determining whether to apply these interventions in clinical practice.

Citation

Geraghty, A. W., Becque, T., Roberts, L. C., Hill, J. C., Foster, N. E., Yardley, L., …Little, P. (2024). Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention with and without telephone support in primary care (SupportBack 2): a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness. The Lancet Rheumatology, 6(7), e424-e437. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2665-9913%2824%2900086-9

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 30, 2024
Online Publication Date May 30, 2024
Publication Date 2024-07
Deposit Date Aug 21, 2024
Journal The Lancet Rheumatology
Print ISSN 2665-9913
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Issue 7
Pages e424-e437
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s2665-9913%2824%2900086-9
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/886781
Additional Information This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention with and without telephone support in primary care (SupportBack 2): a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness; Journal Title: The Lancet Rheumatology; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00086-9; CrossRef DOI link to the associated document: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00116-4; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.