Ben Bradford
‘To whom am I speaking?’; Public responses to crime reporting via live chat with human versus AI police operators
Bradford, Ben; Kyprianides, Arabella; Andrews, Will; Aston, Elizabeth; Clayton, Estelle; O’Neill, Megan; Wells, Helen
Authors
Arabella Kyprianides
Will Andrews
Elizabeth Aston
Estelle Clayton
Megan O’Neill
Helen Wells h.m.wells@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Driven by social and technological change and the imperative to enhance efficiency, police have in recent years adopted various technologies to transform their interactions with the public. In the UK, these initiatives often fall under ‘transformation’ agendas, promoting ‘channel choice’ strategies to facilitate public interactions through various technologically mediated platforms, such as reporting crimes online using form-based or chat functions. Artificial Intelligence already plays a role in some of these interactions, which is likely only to increase in the future. In this study we examine preferences and perceptions in online crime reporting. Participants read a fictitious ‘chat’ between a victim of crime and a police operator identified as either a human or a chatbot. Although the chats were identical, we find a consistent preference for human operators over chatbots across all scenarios. Human operators were thought to provide clearer explanations, although there were no significant differences in judgements of interpersonal treatment or decision neutrality between human and chatbot operators. Participants also responded more positively to the process when (a) the crime involved was less serious and (b) when the outcome was active (police attendance) rather than passive (simple recording). Our findings underscore the importance of procedural justice and communication clarity in online crime reporting systems – and perhaps of human interaction when reporting crimes.
Citation
Bradford, B., Kyprianides, A., Andrews, W., Aston, E., Clayton, E., O’Neill, M., & Wells, H. (in press). ‘To whom am I speaking?’; Public responses to crime reporting via live chat with human versus AI police operators. Policing and Society, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2025.2453437
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 9, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 19, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Jan 27, 2025 |
Journal | Policing and Society |
Print ISSN | 1043-9463 |
Electronic ISSN | 1477-2728 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 1-17 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2025.2453437 |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1052171 |
Publisher URL | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2025.2453437 |
Additional Information | Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=gpas20; Received: 2024-06-25; Accepted: 2025-01-09; Published: 2025-01-19 |
You might also like
‘Virtual policing’, trust and legitimacy
(2022)
Book Chapter
Technology and Police Legitimacy
(2022)
Book Chapter
Introduction: Contemporary policing and non-warranted volunteering
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search