Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Improvingpatient understanding of GEPtestresults (IMPARTER4): an RCT

Fallowfield, Lesley; Solis-Trapala, Ivonne; Starkings, Rachel; Matthews, Lucy; May, Shirley; Jenkins, Valerie

Authors

Lesley Fallowfield

Rachel Starkings

Lucy Matthews

Shirley May

Valerie Jenkins



Abstract

Objective Explaining gene expression profiling (GEP) test results to patients can be challenging. We examined the utility of two 8 min films about Oncotype DX and Prosigna to aid the knowledge and decision-making of women with early-stage oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer.

Methods and analysis Patients awaiting GEP test results completed an anxiety questionnaire and the intolerance of uncertainty scale (IUS) before randomisation and divided into Group A (standard verbal and/or written hospital information) or Group B (standard information plus GEP film). Prior to results, they were interviewed about their GEP test knowledge and how the recurrence risk helps determine treatment options. After the results consultation, participants answered two further questionnaires. Participating clinicians completed IUS scales and reported their satisfaction with the results discussions.

Results 230/251 patients completed the study (Group A (n=106) and Group B (n=124)). The total knowledge score was higher in Group B (estimated between groups mean difference of 2.5 (95% CI:1.7 to 3.4) p<0.001). Most treatment decisions adhered to recommended risk of recurrence thresholds, although patients with higher trait anxiety were more likely to make less apparently rational decisions OR=0.93 (95%CI 0.88 to 0.97) p=0.002 (163/230; 70.8% received ET alone; 65/230; 28% ET plus chemotherapy, and two sought second opinions). Clinicians reported slightly longer consultations for Group A participants who tended to ask more difficult and unexpected questions.

Conclusion Patients who received standard verbal and written information plus film had increased knowledge about GEP tests compared with standard information alone.

Citation

Fallowfield, L., Solis-Trapala, I., Starkings, R., Matthews, L., May, S., & Jenkins, V. (2025). Improvingpatient understanding of GEPtestresults (IMPARTER4): an RCT. BMJ Oncology, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000689

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 7, 2025
Online Publication Date Mar 21, 2025
Publication Date 2025-03
Deposit Date Mar 31, 2025
Journal BMJ Oncology
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000689
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1112787
Publisher URL https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/