Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Percutaneous or surgical revascularization in patients with severe left main coronary artery disease in Latin America: A GRADE clinical practice guideline.

Lamelas, Pablo; Pompeu Sá, Michel; Izcovich, Ariel; Bottaro, Federico; Tisi Baña, Matias; Sosa Liprandi, Maria Ines; Lanas, Fernando; Vilca Mejia, Omar Asdrúbal; Zuñiga Luna, Mauricio; Aubanel, Patricia; Munera, Ana; Contreras Reyes, Juan; Bagur, Rodrigo; Whitlock, Richard; Garcia Garcia, Hector; Mamas, Mamas; Cohen, Mauricio G; Ricalde, Alejando; Abizaid, Alexandre; Mendiz, Oscar; Araya, Mario; Costa, Ricardo; Santaera, Omar; Hidalgo, Pedro; Caldonazo, Tulio; Baranchuk, Adrian; Ragusa, Martín Alberto

Authors

Pablo Lamelas

Michel Pompeu Sá

Ariel Izcovich

Federico Bottaro

Matias Tisi Baña

Maria Ines Sosa Liprandi

Fernando Lanas

Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia

Mauricio Zuñiga Luna

Patricia Aubanel

Ana Munera

Juan Contreras Reyes

Rodrigo Bagur

Richard Whitlock

Hector Garcia Garcia

Mauricio G Cohen

Alejando Ricalde

Alexandre Abizaid

Oscar Mendiz

Mario Araya

Ricardo Costa

Omar Santaera

Pedro Hidalgo

Tulio Caldonazo

Adrian Baranchuk

Martín Alberto Ragusa



Abstract

Severe left main coronary artery disease (LMD) poses a major treatment challenge in Latin America, where both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are used. This guideline was developed de novo using the GRADE approach. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed evidence from a systematic review of randomized trials comparing PCI and CABG, incorporating a comprehensive literature search of patient values and preferences and outcome utilities. Thresholds were assigned for each clinical outcome, from small to large effect. Five randomized trials enrolling 4612 patients were included. At 30 days, PCI resulted in a large reduction in major bleeding and a small reduction in strokes. At 5 years, PCI was associated with a small to moderate increase of spontaneous myocardial infarction and a moderate to large increase in repeat revascularization. No important differences in short- or long-term mortality were observed between PCI and CABG. The overall certainty of evidence was rated low. There was a notable variability in patient values and a close call on the balance of effects. For patients in Latin America with severe left main coronary artery disease, the guideline panel suggests either PCI or CABG. This is a conditional recommendation, based on low certainty in the evidence (⨁⨁◯◯). It applies when both procedures are clinically and anatomically appropriate and can be performed at centers meeting acceptable standards. The decision should be made through a shared decision-making process involving the patient and the multidisciplinary care team. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.]

Citation

Lamelas, P., Pompeu Sá, M., Izcovich, A., Bottaro, F., Tisi Baña, M., Sosa Liprandi, M. I., Lanas, F., Vilca Mejia, O. A., Zuñiga Luna, M., Aubanel, P., Munera, A., Contreras Reyes, J., Bagur, R., Whitlock, R., Garcia Garcia, H., Mamas, M., Cohen, M. G., Ricalde, A., Abizaid, A., Mendiz, O., …Ragusa, M. A. (2025). Percutaneous or surgical revascularization in patients with severe left main coronary artery disease in Latin America: A GRADE clinical practice guideline. International Journal of Cardiology, 436(1 October 2025), Article 133401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133401

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 16, 2025
Online Publication Date May 20, 2025
Publication Date May 20, 2025
Deposit Date Jun 9, 2025
Journal International journal of cardiology
Print ISSN 0167-5273
Electronic ISSN 1874-1754
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 436
Issue 1 October 2025
Article Number 133401
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133401
Keywords CABG, PCI, CAD
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1276809
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325004449?via%3Dihub