Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Development of a tool to predict outcome of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

Kuiper

Development of a tool to predict outcome of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

Objective. The study had 2 objectives: first, to evaluate the success of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in
terms of incidence of surgical re-intervention, including arthroplasty, and investigate predictors of successful treatment
outcome. The second objective was to derive a tool predicting a patient’s arthroplasty risk following ACI. Design. In this
Level II, prognostic study, 170 ACI-treated patients (110 males [aged 36.8 ± 9.4 years]; 60 females [aged 38.1 ± 10.2
years]) completed a questionnaire about further surgery on their knee treated with ACI 10.9 ± 3.5 years previously.
Factors commonly assessed preoperatively (age, gender, defect location and number, previous surgery at this site, and the
preoperative Lysholm score) were used as independent factors in regression analyses. Results. At final follow-up (maximum
of 19 years post-ACI), 40 patients (23.5%) had undergone surgical re-intervention following ACI. Twenty-six patients
(15.3%) underwent arthroplasty, more commonly females (25%) than males (10%; P = 0.001). Cox regression analyses
identified 4 factors associated with re-intervention: age at ACI, multiple operations before ACI, patellar defects, and lower
pretreatment Lysholm scores (Nagelkerke’s R2
= 0.20). Six predictive items associated with risk of arthroplasty following
ACI (Nagelkerke’s R2
= 0.34) were used to develop the Oswestry Risk of Knee Arthroplasty index with internal crossvalidation. Conclusion. In a single-center study, we have identified 6 factors (age, gender, location and number of defects,
number of previous operations, and Lysholm score before ACI) that appear to influence the likelihood of ACI patients
progressing to arthroplasty. We have used this information to propose a formula or “tool” that could aid treatment
decisions and improve patient selection for ACI.

Acceptance Date Apr 3, 2016
Publication Date May 23, 2016
Journal Cartilage
Print ISSN 1947-6035
Publisher SAGE Publications
Pages 119-130
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603516650002
Keywords prediction tool; success of ACI; further surgery; cartilage repair
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1947603516650002

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations