Surgery for Tennis Elbow: a Systematic Review

Abstract

Background
There is no consensus on the most suitable treatment for tennis elbow but, in the USA, surgical intervention is increasing despite a lack of supportive research evidence. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a balanced update based on all relevant published randomized controlled trials conducted to date.

Methods
An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, BNI, AMED, PsycINFO, HBE, HMIC, PubMed, TRIP, Dynamed Plus and The Cochrane Library was complemented by hand searching. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and data were synthesized narratively, based on levels of evidence, as a result of heterogeneity.

Results
Twelve studies of poor methodological quality were included. The available data suggest that surgical interventions for tennis elbow are no more effective than nonsurgical and sham interventions. Surgical technique modifications may enhance effectiveness compared to traditional methods but have not been tested against a placebo.

Conclusions
Current research evidence suggests that surgery for tennis elbow is no more effective than nonsurgical treatment based on evidence with significant methodological limitations. Given the recalcitrant nature of tennis elbow for some patients, further research in the form of a high-quality placebo-controlled surgical trial with an additional conservative arm is required to usefully inform clinical practice.

Citation

(2017). Surgery for Tennis Elbow: a Systematic Review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217745041

• Acceptance Date: Oct 31, 2017
• Publication Date: Dec 11, 2017
• Journal: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
• Print ISSN: 1058-2746
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Pages: 35-44
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217745041
• Keywords: tennis; elbow; surgery; systematic review
• Publisher URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1758573217745041