Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Do we need rights in bioethics discourse?

Sim

Do we need rights in bioethics discourse? Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

Moral rights feature prominently, and are relied on substantially, in debates in bioethics. Conceptually, however, duties can perform the logical work of rights, but not vice versa, and reference to rights is therefore inessential. Normatively, rights, like duties, depend upon more basic moral values or principles, and attempts to establish the logical priority of rights over duties, or the reverse, are misguided. In practical decision-making, however, an analysis in terms of duties is more fruitful than one based on rights. A right may function as a proxy term for a consequentialist rule, or for a deontological constraint, but does not thereby enrich these concepts. Rights may also help in a purely expressive sense, and may assist an initial focusing on a moral conflict. However, their role in bioethics discourse is more one of convenience than of necessity. Moreover, unless rights are firmly founded on fundamental moral values, their use encourages rhetoric rather than argument.

Citation

Sim. (2020). Do we need rights in bioethics discourse?. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 45(3), 312-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa004

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 23, 2018
Online Publication Date Apr 9, 2020
Publication Date 2020-06
Journal Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
Print ISSN 0360-5310
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 45
Issue 3
Pages 312-331
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa004
Keywords rights; duties; consequentialism; bioethics
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa004

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations