Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Options for Plantar Heel Pain: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis

Babatunde, Opeyemi; Legha, Amardeep; Littlewood, Chris; Chesterton, Linda S; Thomas, Martin J; B Menz, Hylton; Van Der Windt, Danielle; Roddy, Edward

Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of current treatment options for plantar heel pain (PHP).

Design
Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).

Data Sources
Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, and WHO Clinical Trials Platform were searched from their inception until January 2018.
Study selection: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with PHP investigating common treatments (i.e. corticosteroid injection, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapeutic exercise, orthoses and/or extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)) compared with each other or a no treatment, placebo/sham control.

Data extraction and analysis
Data were extracted and checked for accuracy and completeness by pairs of reviewers. Primary outcomes were pain and function. Comparative treatment effects were analysed by random effects network meta-analysis in the short, medium, and long term. Relative ranking of treatments was assessed by surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities (0-100 scale).

Results
Thirty-one RCTs (total n= 2450 patients) were included. There was no evidence of inconsistency detected between direct and indirect treatment comparisons in the networks, but sparse data led to frequently wide confidence intervals. Available evidence does not suggest that any of the commonly used treatments for the management of PHP are better than any other, although corticosteroid injections, alone or in combination with exercise, and ESWT were ranked most likely to be effective for the management of short, medium and long term pain or function; Placebo/sham/control appeared least likely to be effective; and exercise appeared to only be beneficial for long term pain or function.

Conclusions
Current evidence is equivocal regarding which treatment is the most effective for the management of PHP. Given limited understanding of long-term effects, there is need for large, methodologically robust multicentre RCTs investigating and directly comparing commonly used treatments for the management of PHP.

Citation

Babatunde, O., Legha, A., Littlewood, C., Chesterton, L. S., Thomas, M. J., B Menz, H., …Roddy, E. (2018). Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Options for Plantar Heel Pain: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(3), https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098998

• Journal Article Type: Review
• Acceptance Date: Jun 1, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Jan 21, 2019
• Publication Date: Jun 28, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: May 26, 2023
• Journal: British Journal of Sports Medicine
• Print ISSN: 0306-3674
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 53
• Issue: 3
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098998
• Publisher URL: https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/53/3/182