Martin Thomas m.thomas@keele.ac.uk
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Options for Plantar Heel Pain: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis
Thomas; Babatunde; Van Der Windt; Roddy
Authors
Dr Opeyemi Babatunde o.babatunde@keele.ac.uk
Danielle Van Der Windt d.van.der.windt@keele.ac.uk
Edward Roddy e.roddy@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of current treatment options for plantar heel pain (PHP).
Design
Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).
Data sources
Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, Cochrane Database, Web of Science and WHO Clinical Trials Platform were searched from their inception until January 2018.
Study selection
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with PHP investigating common treatments (ie, corticosteroid injection, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, therapeutic exercise, orthoses and/or extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)) compared with each other or a no treatment, placebo/sham control.
Data extraction and analysis
Data were extracted and checked for accuracy and completeness by pairs of reviewers. Primary outcomes were pain and function. Comparative treatment effects were analysed by random effects NMA in the short term, medium term and long term. Relative ranking of treatments was assessed by surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities (0–100 scale).
Results
Thirty-one RCTs (total n=2450?patients) were included. There was no evidence of inconsistency detected between direct and indirect treatment comparisons in the networks, but sparse data led to frequently wide CIs. Available evidence does not suggest that any of the commonly used treatments for the management of PHP are better than any other, although corticosteroid injections, alone or in combination with exercise, and ESWT were ranked most likely to be effective for the management of short-term, medium-term and long-term pain or function; placebo/sham/control appeared least likely to be effective; and exercise appeared to only be beneficial for long-term pain or function.
Conclusions
Current evidence is equivocal regarding which treatment is the most effective for the management of PHP. Given limited understanding of long-term effects, there is need for large, methodologically robust multicentre RCTs investigating and directly comparing commonly used treatments for the management of PHP.
Citation
Babatunde, Van Der Windt, Roddy, & Thomas. (2018). Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Options for Plantar Heel Pain: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098998
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 1, 2018 |
Publication Date | Jun 28, 2018 |
Journal | British Journal of Sports Medicine |
Print ISSN | 0306-3674 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 53 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 1-14 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098998 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098998 |
Files
PHP NMA Manuscript updated May 2018_Accepted.pdf
(3.5 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: rehabilitation
(2022)
Journal Article
Osteoarthritis Flares.
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search