Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Association of admitting physician specialty and care quality and outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): insights from a national registry.

Moledina, Saadiq M; Shoaib, Ahmad; Graham, Michelle M; Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe; Van Spall, Harriette G C; Kontopantelis, Evangelos; Rashid, Muhammad; Aktaa, Suleman; Gale, Chris P; Weston, Clive; Mamas, Mamas A

Association of admitting physician specialty and care quality and outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): insights from a national registry. Thumbnail


Authors

Saadiq M Moledina

Ahmad Shoaib

Michelle M Graham

Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai

Harriette G C Van Spall

Evangelos Kontopantelis

Suleman Aktaa

Chris P Gale

Clive Weston



Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between admitting physician specialty and care quality and outcomes for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS & RESULTS: We identified 288,420 patients hospitalised with NSTEMI between 2010-2017 in the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) database. The cohort was dichotomised according to care under a non-cardiologist (n?=?146,722) and care under a cardiologist (n?=?141,698) within the first 24?hours of admission to hospital. Patients admitted under a cardiologist were significantly younger (70-years vs 75 years, P?<?0.001), and less likely to be female (32% vs 39%, P?<?0.001). Independent factors associated with admission under a cardiologist included: prior history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (OR:1.04, 95% CI:1.01-1.07, P?=?0.04), hypercholesterolaemia (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.15-1.20, P?<?0.001), hypertension (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, P?=?0.01) and admission to an interventional centre (OR: 3.90, 95% CI: 3.79 - 4.00, P?<?0.001). Patients admitted under cardiology were more likely to receive optimal pharmacotherapy, undergo invasive coronary angiography (79% vs 60%, P?<?0.001), and receive revascularization in the form of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (52% vs 36%, P?<?0.001). Following propensity score matching, odds of in-hospital all-cause mortality (OR:0.81, 95% CI: 0.79-0.85, P?<?0.001), reinfarction (OR:0.78, 95% CI: 0.66-0.91, P?=?0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.78-0.84, P?<?0.001) were lower in patients admitted under a cardiologist. CONCLUSION: Patients with NSTEMI admitted under a cardiologist within 24?hours of hospital admission were more likely to receive guideline directed management and had better clinical outcomes.

Citation

Moledina, S. M., Shoaib, A., Graham, M. M., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Van Spall, H. G. C., Kontopantelis, E., …Mamas, M. A. (2022). Association of admitting physician specialty and care quality and outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): insights from a national registry. European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 8(5), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab038

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 11, 2021
Online Publication Date May 12, 2021
Publication Date 2022-09
Journal European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Print ISSN 2058-5225
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 8
Issue 5
Pages 557–567
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab038
Keywords NSTEMI; Cardiologist; Specialty; Mortality
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/420171
Publisher URL https://academic.oup.com/ehjqcco/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab038/6274897

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations