Karen J. Dunn
The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.
Dunn, Karen J.; McCray, Gareth
Abstract
For practical and theoretical purposes, tests of second language (L2) ability commonly aim to measure one overarching trait, general language ability, while simultaneously measuring multiple sub-traits (e.g., reading, grammar, etc.). This tension between measuring uni- and multi-dimensional constructs concurrently can generate vociferous debate about the precise nature of the construct(s) being measured. In L2 testing, this tension is often addressed through the use of a higher-order factor model wherein multidimensional traits representing subskills load on a general ability latent trait. However, an alternative modeling framework that is currently uncommon in language testing, but gaining traction in other disciplines, is the bifactor model. The bifactor model hypothesizes a general factor, onto which all items load, and a series of orthogonal (uncorrelated) skill-specific grouping factors. The model is particularly valuable for evaluating the empirical plausibility of subscales and the practical impact of dimensionality assumptions on test scores. This paper compares a range of CFA model structures with the bifactor model in terms of theoretical implications and practical considerations, framed for the language testing audience. The models are illustrated using primary data from the British Council's Aptis English test. The paper is intended to spearhead the uptake of the bifactor model within the cadre of measurement models used in L2 language testing.
Citation
Dunn, K. J., & McCray, G. (2020). The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1- 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 22, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 17, 2020 |
Publication Date | Jul 17, 2020 |
Journal | Frontiers in Psychology |
Publisher | Frontiers Media |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Article Number | 1357 |
Pages | 1- 16 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357 |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/420257 |
Publisher URL | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357/full |
Files
fpsyg-11-01357.pdf
(1.3 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Investigating the construct measured by banked gap-fill items: Evidence from eye-tracking
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search