Intrathecal morphine in combination with bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective cohort study

Trivedi, R.; John, J.; Ghodke, A.; Trivedi, J.; Munigangaiah, S.; Dheerendra, S.; Balain, B.; Ockendon, M.; Kuiper, J.

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) in combination with bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery. This is in comparison with traditional opioid analgesics such as intravenous (IV) morphine.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Two groups were identified retrospectively. The first (ITM group) included patients who had general anaesthesia (GA) with low-dose spinal anaesthesia prior to induction using 1–4 mls of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.2 mg ITM. 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered per hour of predicted surgery time, up to a maximum of 4 ml. The insertion level for the spinal anaesthetic corresponded to the spinal level of the iliac crest line and the level at which the spinal cord terminated. The control group had GA without any spinal anaesthesia. Patients were instead administered opioid analgesia in the form of IV morphine or diamorphine. The primary outcome was the consumption of opioids administered intraoperatively and in recovery, and over the first 48 h following discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Total opioid dose was measured, and a morphine equivalent dose was calculated. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores in recovery and at day two postoperatively, and the length of stay in hospital.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>For the ITM group, the median total amount of IV morphine equivalent administered intraoperatively and in recovery, was 0 mg versus 17 mg. The median total amount morphine equivalent, administered over the first 48 h following discharge from PACU was 20 mg versus 80 mg. Both are in comparison with the control group. The median length of stay was over 1 day less and the median VAS for pain in recovery was 6 points lower. No evidence was found for a difference in the worst VAS for pain at day two postoperatively.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>ITM in combination with bupivacaine results in a significantly decreased use of perioperative opioids. In addition, length of hospital stay is reduced and so too is patient perceived pain intensity.</jats:p> <jats:p><jats:italic>Trial registration</jats:italic> The study was approved by the ethics committee at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital as a service improvement project (Approval no. 1617_004).</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Citation

Trivedi, R., John, J., Ghodke, A., Trivedi, J., Munigangaiah, S., Dheerendra, S., …Kuiper, J. (2022). Intrathecal morphine in combination with bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03124-2

• Acceptance Date: Mar 3, 2022
• Publication Date: Dec 1, 2022
• Journal: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03124-2
• Public URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/423101
• Publisher URL: https://josr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13018-022-03124-2