Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The Ontology of Freedom

Tartaglia

Authors



Abstract

I begin by clarifying Tallis’s revisionary terminology, showing how he redraws the lines of the traditional debate about free will by classifying himself as a compatibilist, when in standard terms he is an incompatibilist. I then examine what I take to be the two main lines of argument in Freedom, which I call the Mysterian Argument and the Intentionality Argument. I argue that neither can do the required work on its own, so I ask how they are supposed to combine. I then argue that a commitment to the ontological priority of everydayness, of the kind suggested in chapters 5 and 6 of Freedom, might combine the arguments in such a way as to secure Tallis’s conclusion. I conclude that the argument of Freedom requires positive metaphysical commitment of a kind Tallis has yet to provide.

Acceptance Date Jul 27, 2022
Publication Date Oct 26, 2022
Journal Human Affairs
Publisher De Gruyter
Pages 461-473
DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-0040
Keywords free will; determinism; compatibilism; libertarianism; metaphysics; F.H. Bradley
Publisher URL https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2022-0040/html

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations