Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The role of confidence in knowledge ascriptions: an evidence-seeking approach

Francis, Kathryn B.; Beaman, C. Philip

The role of confidence in knowledge ascriptions: an evidence-seeking approach Thumbnail


Authors

C. Philip Beaman



Abstract

Two methods have been used in the investigation of the stakes-sensitivity of knowledge as it occurs in ordinary language: (a) asking participants about the truth or acceptability of knowledge ascriptions and (b) asking participants how much evidence someone needs to gather before they know that something is the case. This second, “evidence-seeking”, method has reliably found effects of stakes-sensitivity while the method of asking about knowledge ascriptions has not. Consistent with this pattern, in Francis et al. (Ergo, 2019), we found evidence of scalar stakes effects using an evidence-seeking approach. Whilst we found this evidence across several cases using both negative (“don’t know”) and positive (“know”) polarities, there remain questions about the directness of the relationship between stakes and knowledge ascriptions; it is possible that stakes are affecting knowledge by affecting the confidence of the attributor. For example, Bach (in: Peter & Preyer, 2005) has argued that knowledge attributions do not track truth attributions but rather thresholds for doxastic confidence. To investigate the role of confidence in knowledge ascriptions, we use our existing paradigm (Francis et al., 2019) but include measures of both participant and protagonist confidence. As far as we are aware, this is the first empirical investigation of the role of confidence in stakes effects on knowledge that incorporates an evidence-seeking approach using several scenarios. Overall, across both positive (“know”) and negative (“don’t know”) polarity conditions, we find further evidence of a stakes effect on knowledge using an evidence-seeking paradigm. However, and importantly, we do not find evidence that changes in participant confidence partially or fully mediate the stakes effect on knowledge.

Citation

Francis, K. B., & Beaman, C. P. (2023). The role of confidence in knowledge ascriptions: an evidence-seeking approach. Synthese, 202(2), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04236-w

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 17, 2023
Online Publication Date Jul 17, 2023
Publication Date Jul 17, 2023
Deposit Date Jul 20, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jul 20, 2023
Journal Synthese
Print ISSN 0039-7857
Electronic ISSN 1573-0964
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 202
Issue 2
Article Number 30
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04236-w
Keywords Evidence-seeking, Stakes-sensitivity of knowledge, Confidence, Knowledge ascriptions
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-023-04236-w#rightslink

Files

Francis -Confidence (445 Kb)
PDF

Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations