Emma Healey e.healey@keele.ac.uk
The acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a walking intervention for older people with persistent musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A mixed methods evaluation of the iPOPP pilot trial
Healey, Emma L.; McBeth, John; Nicholls, Elaine; Chew‐Graham, Carolyn A.; Dent, Stephen; Foster, Nadine E.; Herron, Daniel; Pincus, Tamar; Hartshorne, Liz; Hay, Elaine M.; Jinks, Clare
Authors
John McBeth
Elaine Nicholls
Carolyn Chew-Graham c.a.chew-graham@keele.ac.uk
Stephen Dent
Nadine E. Foster
Daniel Herron
Tamar Pincus
Liz Hartshorne
Elaine Hay e.m.hay@keele.ac.uk
Clare Jinks c.jinks@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Introduction: Persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is associated with physical inactivity in older people. While walking is an acceptable form of physical activity, the effectiveness of walking interventions in this population has yet to be established.
Objectives: To assess the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of a healthcare assistant‐led walking intervention for older people with persistent MSK pain (iPOPP) in primary care.
Methods: A mixed method, three arm pilot RCT was conducted in four general practices and recruited patients aged ≥65 years with persistent MSK pain. Participants were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to: (i) usual care, (ii) usual care plus a pedometer intervention, or (iii) usual care plus the iPOPP walking intervention. Descriptive statistics were used in an exploratory analysis of the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. A triangulation protocol was used to integrate the analyses from the mixed methods.
Results: All pre‐specified success criteria were achieved in terms of feasibility (recruitment, follow‐up and iPOPP intervention adherence) and acceptability. Triangulation of the data identified the need, in the future, to make the iPOPP training (for intervention deliverers) more patient‐centred to better support already active patients and the use of individualised goal setting and improve accelerometry data collection processes to increase the amount of valid data.
Conclusions: This pilot trial suggests that the iPOPP intervention and a future full‐scale RCT are both acceptable and feasible. The use of a triangulation protocol enabled more robust conclusions about acceptability and feasibility to be drawn.
Citation
Healey, E. L., McBeth, J., Nicholls, E., Chew‐Graham, C. A., Dent, S., Foster, N. E., …Jinks, C. (2023). The acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a walking intervention for older people with persistent musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A mixed methods evaluation of the iPOPP pilot trial. Musculoskeletal Care, https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1815
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 24, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 9, 2023 |
Publication Date | Sep 9, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Sep 21, 2023 |
Journal | Musculoskeletal Care |
Print ISSN | 1478-2189 |
Electronic ISSN | 1557-0681 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1815 |
Keywords | data triangulation, older people, musculoskeletal pain, randomised controlled trial, walking, physical activity, primary care |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/578443 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/msc.1815 |
You might also like
Non healthcare exercise professional led exercise for osteoarthritis - a cochrane review
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search