Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Team assessment of behaviour: a high stakes assessment with potential for poor implementation and impaired validity

Whitehouse, Andrew; Higginbotham, Laura; Nathavitharana, Kamal; Singh, Baldev; Hassell, Andrew

Authors

Andrew Whitehouse

Laura Higginbotham

Kamal Nathavitharana

Baldev Singh



Abstract

Team assessment of behaviour (TAB) is the multi-source feedback assessment of professional behaviours that all UK foundation doctors must engage in twice during their two-year programme. TAB can identify the few underperforming trainees and provide feedback to consolidate the good practice of most. For optimum validity, TAB must be undertaken by a range of assessors, as specified in the national UK Foundation Programme curriculum. This study reports an audit of invalid TAB submissions over a three-year cycle in the West Midlands’ Foundation Programme. In 2010, large numbers of TABs were invalid, owing to an incorrect selection or number of assessors. Introduction of validity checking before sign-off greatly improved the numbers of valid assessments in 2011. This was partially sustained in 2012. Assurance of assessment validity is important to ensure delivery of appropriate constructive feedback and to allow early detection and remediation of signs of poor professional behaviours in foundation doctors.

Citation

Whitehouse, A., Higginbotham, L., Nathavitharana, K., Singh, B., & Hassell, A. (2015). Team assessment of behaviour: a high stakes assessment with potential for poor implementation and impaired validity. Clinical Medicine, 15(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-7

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Apr 3, 2024
Publication Date 2015-02
Deposit Date Nov 28, 2023
Journal Clinical Medicine
Print ISSN 1470-2118
Electronic ISSN 1473-4893
Publisher Royal College of Physicians
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 1
Pages 7-9
DOI https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-7
Keywords General Medicine
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/650018