Alexandra Kent a.kent@keele.ac.uk
Emergency or Not? Dealing with Borderline Cases in Emergency Police Calls
Kent, Alexandra; Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
Authors
Heidi Kevoe-Feldman
Abstract
We examine occasions when callers phone emergency services yet preface their reason for calling as ‘not an emergency’. Data are phone calls to US (911) and UK (999) emergency lines and UK (101) non-emergency police lines. Data has been transcribed using Jefferson conventions and analysed using conversation analysis. The ‘not an emergency’ formulation is recurrently used to mark a shaky or borderline fit between the caller’s situation and the emergency category presumed by the dedicated phoneline. Typically, ‘not an emergency’ formulations prefaced descriptions of a possible emergency in which the caller balances the justification for the call on the boundary of what counts as an emergency. Recurrent concerns for callers using “not an emergency” are to manage pre-emptive calls about impending potential emergency, and to disclaim responsibility for the decision to call an emergency service. Call takers offer callers latitude to present a complicated description of their circumstances instead of swiftly sanctioning them for an inappropriate call. Our paper contributes to work on how the boundaries between categories are constructed and negotiated in interaction. Data are in British and American English.
Citation
Kent, A., & Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2024). Emergency or Not? Dealing with Borderline Cases in Emergency Police Calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 57(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2024.2340407
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 11, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | May 2, 2024 |
Publication Date | May 2, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Dec 13, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 3, 2025 |
Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
Print ISSN | 0835-1813 |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-7973 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 57 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 151-168 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2024.2340407 |
Keywords | Categorisation, conversation analysis, emergency calls, police, entitlement, institutional interaction |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/667611 |
Files
This file is under embargo until Nov 3, 2025 due to copyright reasons.
Contact a.kent@keele.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.
You might also like
Police call-takers' first substantive question projects the outcome of the call
(2019)
Journal Article
Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search