Baldev Singh
A prediction algorithm to improve the accuracy of the Gold Standard Framework Surprise Question end-of-life prognostic categories in an acute hospital admission cohort-controlled study. The Proactive Risk-Based and Data-Driven Assessment of Patients at the End of Life (PRADA)
Singh, Baldev; Kumari-Dewat, Nisha; Ryder, Adam; Klaire, Vijay; Bennion, Gemma; Jennens, Hannah; Matthews, Dawn; Rayner, Sophie; Ritzenthaler, Benoit; Shears, Jean; Ahmed, Kamran; Sidhu, Mona; Viswanath, Ananth; Warren, Kate; Parry, Emma
Authors
Nisha Kumari-Dewat
Adam Ryder
Vijay Klaire
Gemma Bennion
Hannah Jennens
Dawn Matthews
Sophie Rayner
Benoit Ritzenthaler
Jean Shears
Kamran Ahmed
Mona Sidhu
Ananth Viswanath
Kate Warren
Emma Parry e.parry@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Objective To determine the accuracy of a clinical data algorithm allocated end-of-life prognosis amongst hospital inpatients.
Method The model allocated a predicted Gold Standard Framework end-of-life prognosis to all acute medical patients admitted over a 2-year period. Mortality was determined at 1 year.
Results Of 18,838 patients, end-of-life prognosis was unknown in 67.9%. A binary logistic regression model calculated 1-year mortality probability (X2=6650.2, p<0.001, r2 = 0.43). Probability cut off points were used to triage those with unknown prognosis using the GSF Surprise Question “Yes” or “No” survival categories (> or < 1 year respectively), with subsidiary classification of “No” to Green (months), Amber (weeks) or Red (days). This digitally driven prognosis allocation (100% vs baseline 32.1%) yielded cohorts of GSFSQ-Yes 15,264 (81%), GSFSQ-No Green 1,771 (9.4%) and GSFSQ-No Amber or Red 1,803 (9.6%).
There were 5,043 (26.8%) deaths at 1 year. In Cox’s survival, model allocated cohorts were discrete for mortality (GSFSQ-Yes 16.4% v GSFSQ-No 71.0% (p<0.001). For the GSFSQ-No classification, the mortality Odds Ratio was 12.4 (11.4 – 13.5) (p<0.001) vs GSFSQ-Yes (c-statistic of 0.71 (0.70 – 0.73), p<0.001; accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of 81.2%, 83.6%, 83.6% respectively. If this tool had been utilised at the time of admission, the potential to reduce subsequent hospital admissions, death-in-hospital, and bed days was all p<0.001.
Conclusions The defined model successfully allocated end-of-life prognosis in cohorts of hospitalised patients with strong performance metrics for prospective 1 year mortality, yielding the potential to provide anticipatory care and improve outcomes.
Citation
Singh, B., Kumari-Dewat, N., Ryder, A., Klaire, V., Bennion, G., Jennens, H., …Parry, E. (2023). A prediction algorithm to improve the accuracy of the Gold Standard Framework Surprise Question end-of-life prognostic categories in an acute hospital admission cohort-controlled study. The Proactive Risk-Based and Data-Driven Assessment of Patients at the End of Life (PRADA). [preprint]
Other Type | Other |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Sep 8, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2023-09 |
Deposit Date | Jan 22, 2024 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.07.23295196 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.07.23295196v1 |
You might also like
Patients' perspectives on flares in knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search