Contextualising and challenging under-representation in research in light of Cultural Trauma: a qualitative focus group and interview study

Fryer, Kate; Hutt, Isobel; Aminu, Habiba; Linton, Emma; White, Johanna; Reynolds, Josie; Mitchell, Caroline

Abstract

Background: Although underserved populations— including those from ethnic minority communities and those living in poverty—have worse health and poorer healthcare experiences, most primary care research does not fairly reflect these groups. Patient and public involvement (PPI) is usually embedded within research studies in the United Kingdom (UK), but often fails to represent underserved populations. This study worked with patient and public contributors and local community leaders, situated in a socio-economically deprived and ethnically diverse urban area, to explore under-representation in primary healthcare research. Methods: We undertook a focus group with a purposive sample of 6 members of a Patient and Public Involvement Group (PPIG), and interviews with 4 community leaders (representing Black, South Asian, Roma and socio-economically deprived communities). An iterative analysis process based on template analysis was used. Focus group 1 was rapidly analysed, and a template created. Findings were presented in focus group 2, and the template further developed. The Cultural Trauma concept was than applied to the template to give a wider theoretical lens. In-depth analysis of focus groups and interviews was then performed based on the template. Results: Wider societal and historical influences have degraded trust in academic and healthcare institutions within underserved populations. Along with more practical considerations, trust underpins personal motivations to engage with research. Researchers need to invest time and resources in prolonged, mutually beneficial engagement with communities of importance to their research, including sharing power and influence over research priorities. Researcher reflexivity regarding differential power and cultural competencies are crucial. Utilising participatory methodologies including co-production demonstrates a commitment to inclusive study design. Conclusions: Re-framing evidence-based medicine to be more useful and relevant to underserved populations with the highest burden of ill health is urgently needed. Lack of representation in primary healthcare research reflects wider societal inequalities, to which Cultural Trauma provides a useful lens. However, there are actions that researchers can take to widen representation. This will ultimately help achieve the goal of increased health equity by enhancing scientific rigour and research generalizability.

Citation

Fryer, K., Hutt, I., Aminu, H., Linton, E., White, J., Reynolds, J., & Mitchell, C. (in press). Contextualising and challenging under-representation in research in light of Cultural Trauma: a qualitative focus group and interview study. Research Involvement and Engagement, 10(1), Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00600-3

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 17, 2024
• Online Publication Date: Jul 2, 2024
• Deposit Date: Jul 8, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 8, 2024
• Journal: Research Involvement and Engagement
• Print ISSN: 2056-7529
• Electronic ISSN: 2056-7529
• Publisher: BioMed Central
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 1
• Article Number: 69
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00600-3
• Keywords: Diverse, Underserved, Participation, Minority, Inclusion, Inequality, Primary care, Deprivation, Inequity, Representation
• Public URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/872180
• Publisher URL: https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-024-00600-3