Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Concurrent validity between self-reported International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and Fibion accelerometer data among young adults in the UAE

Arumugam, Ashokan; Alsaafin, Nour; Shalash, Reime Jamal; Qadah, Raneen Mohammed; Al-Sharman, Alham; Moustafa, Ibrahim M.; Shousha, Tamer M.; Kumaran, Senthil D.; Migliorini, Filippo; Maffulli, Nicola

Authors

Ashokan Arumugam

Nour Alsaafin

Reime Jamal Shalash

Raneen Mohammed Qadah

Alham Al-Sharman

Ibrahim M. Moustafa

Tamer M. Shousha

Senthil D. Kumaran

Filippo Migliorini

Nicola Maffulli



Abstract

Self-reported physical activity questionnaires (e.g., International Physical Activity Questionnaire, IPAQ) are a cost-effective, time-saving, and accessible method to assess sedentary behaviour and physical activity. There are conflicting findings regarding the validity of self-reported questionnaires in comparison to accelerometer-measured data in a free-living environment. This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity between self-reported Arabic–English IPAQ short form (IPAQ-SF) and Fibion (Fibion Inc., Jyväskylä, Finland) accelerometer-measured sedentary and physical activity time among young adults. One hundred and one young healthy adults (mean age 20.8 ± 2.4 years) filled in the IPAQ short form (IPAQ-SF) and wore the Fibion device on the anterior thigh for ≥ 600 min per day for 4–7 days. Concurrent validity between the IPAQ-SF and Fibion accelerometer for sitting, walking, moderate activity, and vigorous activity time was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) and Bland–Altman plots. Significant weak associations between IPAQ-SF and Fibion measurements were found for total activity time (ρ = 0.4; P < 0.001) and for the duration of walking (ρ = 0.3; P = 0.01), moderate (ρ = 0.2; P = 0.02), and vigorous-intensity activities (ρ = 0.4; P < 0.001). However, ρ was not significant (ρ = − 0.2; P = 0.09) for sitting time. In addition, all the plots of the measured variables showed a proportional bias. A low association and agreement were found between self-reported IPAQ-SF scores and Fibion accelerometer measurements among young adults in the UAE. Adult sedentary and physical activity measurements should be obtained objectively with accelerometers rather than being limited to self-reported measures.

Citation

Arumugam, A., Alsaafin, N., Shalash, R. J., Qadah, R. M., Al-Sharman, A., Moustafa, I. M., Shousha, T. M., Kumaran, S. D., Migliorini, F., & Maffulli, N. (in press). Concurrent validity between self-reported International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and Fibion accelerometer data among young adults in the UAE. European Journal of Medical Research, 29(1), Article 426. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01975-5

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 14, 2024
Online Publication Date Aug 19, 2024
Deposit Date Aug 27, 2024
Publicly Available Date Aug 27, 2024
Journal European Journal of Medical Research
Electronic ISSN 2047-783X
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 1
Article Number 426
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01975-5
Keywords Physical activity, International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF), Accelerometer, Validation
Public URL https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/888354
Publisher URL https://eurjmedres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40001-024-01975-5

Files

Concurrent validity between self-reported International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and Fibion accelerometer data among young adults in the UAE (906 Kb)
Archive

Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations