Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs

Yeates, Peter; Cope, Natalie; Hawarden, Ashley; Bradshaw, Hannah; McCray, Gareth; Homer, Matt

Abstract

Background:
Whilst averaging across multiple examiners judgements reduces unwanted overall score variability in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE), designs involving several parallel circuits of the OSCE require that different examiner-cohorts collectively judge performances to the same standard in order to avoid bias. Prior research suggests the potential for important examiner-cohort effects in distributed or national exams which could compromise fairness or patient safety, but despite their importance, these effects are rarely investigated as fully nested assessment designs make them very difficult to study. We describe initial use of a new method to measure and adjust for examiner-cohort effects on students’ scores.

Methods:
We developed Video-based Examiner Score Comparison and Adjustment (VESCA): volunteer students were filmed “live” on 10 out 12 OSCE stations. Following examination, examiners additionally scored station-specific common-comparator videos, producing partial crossing between examiner-cohorts. Many-Facet Rasch Modelling and Linear Mixed Modelling were used to estimate and adjust for examiner-cohort effects on students’ scores.

Results:
After accounting for students’ ability, examiner-cohorts differed substantially in their stringency/leniency (maximal global score difference of 0.47 out of 7.0 (Cohen’s d=0.96); maximal total percentage score difference of 5.7% (Cohen’s d=1.06) for the same student-ability by different examiner-cohorts). Corresponding adjustment of students’ global and total percentage scores altered the theoretical classification of 6.0% of students for both measures (either pass to fail or fail to pass), whilst 8.6-9.5% students’ scores were altered by at least 0.5 standard deviations of student ability.

Conclusions:
Despite typical reliability, the examiner-cohort which students encountered had a potentially important influence on their score, emphasising the need for adequate sampling and examiner training. Development and validation of VESCA may offer a means to measure and/or adjust for potential systematic differences in scoring patterns with could exist between locations in distributed or national OSCE exams, thereby ensuring equivalence and fairness.

Citation

Yeates, P., Cope, N., Hawarden, A., Bradshaw, H., McCray, G., & Homer, M. (2019). Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs. Medical Education, 53(3), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13783

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Nov 7, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Dec 21, 2018
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Publicly Available Date: May 26, 2023
• Journal: Medical Education
• Print ISSN: 0308-0110
• Publisher: Wiley
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 53
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 250-263
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13783
• Keywords: assessment, OSCEs, assessor variability, psychometrics
• Publisher URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13783